________________
Shri Mahavir Jain Aradhana Kendra
www.kobatirth.orgAcharya Shri Kailashsagarsuri Gyanmandir
( 56
)
4 .. saghadhadhamaa andhah.te prudhijane"
abhi..ti' prañai samesabudhaşavaka
Foot-note:
in every part of the line, Fr. YI! helps us to completo the characters, the lower portions of which it has presorved in part. The initial n of the third påda is wholly preserved there also.)
Cf. Dharmap., 59.
a. The reading sagudharthamaa appears to me certain,
except the last letter which might be e or i; the lower part is not visible. The word remains difficult. I can only get out of the trouble by admit. ting that the scribe has, through mistake, written saghadha for sagara=sarikāra. This is what follows from a comparison with the previous verse. Sagharı =samkhāra would, in itself, not be inexplicable. Cf., however, line 14. As regards the second part, it only remains for me to take dhamae=dharme, just
we have in the inscription of Takht i Bahi satutimae, etc. The expression “ hich is in the condition of dunghill," " which is like the dungbill" can be justified. It seems that the leading is almost hole, which should be=bhüle. If it is not certain, it is at least highly probable. The
transcription prudhi=prthak is remarkable. b. The hh appears certain ; abkirocati may very well
be used=alirocati. Same=samya[k] is the usual orthography in our manuscript.
- some...ga 15]
[Poot-note : : Fr. Crus] 6 yo .[' hasa sabasani sagami" manusa jini eka ji. .....atmana so ho sagamu utamu O
(Fool.note: 'Fr. C291.) Cf. Dhammap., 103. a. The g of sugumi lins once more the form which one
might, hal it appeared only here, loc tempted to interpret as=gr. To be right nearer the Pli, it
For Private And Personal
