________________
Shri Mahavir Jain Aradhana Kendra
www.kobatirth.orgAcharya Shri Kailashsagarsuri Gyanmandir
( !08 ) 18 .... (avathani a..u????? j'[ni sișani tani dhiştani kal' rati o
(Cr“, 15) 19 (yanimani prabhaguni vichitani disodiša kavotaka]"(ni)' [athini tani diştani ka]ratio
(Cro, 16) Cr. Dhammap., v. 119 † (Jarāvayya, v. 4) :Yáu' iniāni apatthāni" ulāpūn' eva särade Kāpotakāni aţthini tăni disvāua kā rati.
Cf. Fa-kheu-pi.li, sec. X-X. ("Old Age"), p. 120:si Jlien old, like autunm leaves, decayed and without
covering, life ebbed ont and dissolution at hand, little good repeutunce then ! "?,
Cf. Cdāuav., ch. i. (“Impermanency"), v. 5:--
“Those pigeon-coloured boves are thrown away and scatter
ed in every direction ; what pleasure is there in looking at them".
Cf. Vasubandhu's Gātbāsangraha, v. 21 (Rockhill's
Udānavarya, Appendix) :
* They (the bodies) are thrown away and scattered in
every direction, like those pigeon-coloured bones; what pleasure, then, is there in looking at them ".
Fuusböll identifies the Prakrit verses with the
following in the Divyavadāna, p. 561 :Yäuimany apaviddhāni vikệiptāni diớo daśa Kupotararmány ashini tāni dệstveha kå ratih. Imāni yāny npasthānăui alābur iva sārade (?)s Savikliavarṇāni bīışāņi tåni drstvéla kå ratiḥ.
Frag. 0. x1110, 1. : Fray. C. «STVO, 1. Frag. C. XIyvo, 2. + Supplied by no, in place of the dot of omission (sco I. Cvo, 16, p. 74). Frag. O. XXIIVO, 29.
Varinnt, aratthāni. * Beal's rendering secuk far from correct.
Tho Ms need by Cowell and Neil roule wprabhe, which is incaningless. The mistake is perhnjes due to the scribe.
For Private And Personal
