________________
Shri Mahavir Jain Aradhana Kendra
www.kobatirth.orgAcharya Shri Kailashsagarsuri Gyanmandir
(6.5)
30
(dhamu cari sucarita) ['<??carita cari dhamayari suh.] seti asmi loki parasa yi o
Foolanotex. Fr. C xiii.
• Fr. v.]
Cf. Dhammap., 169,
31 ['ah][*o nako ya sagami cavadhi vatita sara"
ativaka ti] .. .... [drusilo hi bah]o jano O
(Fool.motes: "Fr. CXI,
. Fr. Oy. > Fr. C XXI.]
Cf. Dhammap., 320.
a. The ternuination elhi, for lah. in cavadhi = cāpātah
would again afford an instance of the change of / into th, if a direct transition could be admitted from te to dhe, dhi, with the Māyachisin le for to. I have nothing more convincing to suggest; this, however, (loes not mean that the explanation satisfies me.
32 1. sa acata“ drusilia malua vavi lata vani kuya su tadha] [ tmana yadha na visamu'
ichati 0]
[Foot-nothe: Fr. O v.
* Fr. C XXII.)
Cf. Dhammar., 162.
a. I know few cases in our Ms. where it would be
tempting to seek for an anusvåra under-written, more than in the ca of acuta, so much accentuated is the hook at the foot. But that would be imprudent; if one coinjares dhi of caraithi in the foregoing line, and ca of carilu in the line preceding that, one will, I think, share this impression and conclude that the scribe, while at work, readily amused limRelf with making manifest the minute details of certain characters,
For Private And Personal
