________________
Vada ]
Gaṇadharavada
Abhrādivikārāṇām yatha vaicitryam vinapi karmanā i Tatha yadi samsarinam bhavet ko nāma tato dosah | 81 (1529) ]
• 115 : •
Trans.-81 Just as a variety of visible changes in the clouds etc. is apprehended even without (the help of) Karman in the same way, what harm is there if it is so in the case of mundane souls also ? (1629 )
टीका- आह- ननु यथाभ्रादिविकाराणामन्तरेणापि कर्म वैचित्र्यं दृश्यते, तथा तेनेव प्रकारेण संसारिजीवस्कन्धानामपि सुख - दुःखादिभावेन वैचित्र्यं यदि कर्मविनापि स्यात्, ततः को नाम दोषो भवेत् ? - न कोऽपीत्यर्थः ॥। ८१ ।। ( १६२९ )
D. C.-A variety of various visible changes in the clouds is apprehended even in the absence of Karman. In the same way, in the case of mundane souls also, there would be no harm if we believe that a variety of vikaras like sukha, duḥkha etc. exists without the help of Karman.
The Acarya replies:
कम्मम्मि व को भेओ जह बज्झक्खंधचित्तया सिद्धा । तह कम्पोग्गलाण व विचित्तया जीवसहियाणं ॥ ८२ ॥ (१६३०)
Kammammi va ko bheo jaha bajjhakkhandhacittaya siddhā Taha kammapoggalāna vi vicittayā jivasahiyānam || 82 (1630 )
[ कर्मणि वा को भेदो यथा बाह्यस्कन्धचित्रता सिद्धा ।
तथा कर्मपुद्गलानामपि विचित्रता जीवसहितानाम् ॥। ८२ ।। (१६३० ) Karmaņi vā ko bhedo yatha bahyaskandhacitrată siddhā | Tatha karmapudgalanamapi vicitrata jivasahitānām || 82 (1630 ) ]
Trans.—82 ( Then ) what difference ( would it make ) even in the case of Karman? Just as the variegation of external objects is proved, variegation of the Karmapudgalas could also be proved. ( 1630 )
