________________
Vada ]
Gañadharavāda
131 ::
purpose. If īs'vara creates body without any purpose he would be taken as frantic, and if he does so with some intention he would lose his Isvaratva. For a siddha and anādi útman is not expected to cherish desire for creating deha etc, as desire is one of the forms of illusion and so on. A number of such arguments could be advanced in this connection, but for fear of grantha-vistāra (extension of the work ) they are not stated here. But in line of the arguments stated above it can also be proved that neither Brahmā nor Vişnu nor any one else can be taken as the Kartā of sarira etc.
Is'vara therefore is not acceptable as the creator of sarira etc., from any point of view, but jîva accompanied by the upakarana Karman, should alone be accepted as the kartā of sarîra etc. अहव सहावं मन्नसि विण्णाणघणाइवेयवुत्ताओ। तह बहुदोसं गोयम ! ताणं च पयाणमयमत्थो ॥२५॥ (१६४३) Ahava sahāvam mannasi vinnaņa ghaṇāi Veyavuttão I Taha bahudosam Goyama! tānam ca payāṇamayamattho 119511(1643) [अथवा स्वभावं मन्यसे विज्ञानधनादिवेदोक्तात ।
ageri itaa ! ani a TEFATHTH: 11 84.11 ( 3883 ) Athavá svabhāvam manyase vijñanaghanādivedoktāti Tathā bahudosam Gautama ! teşām ca padanāmayamartha) 195||(1643)
Trans.-95 Again, O Gautama ! if you think svabhāvam ( to be the kartā of śarira etc ), from the sentences of the Vedas such as “ vijñāna ghana” etc, a number of difficulties will arise. But (ca) the real interpretation of those sentences is this
Etfor37% "fasraga paaralary:" uric ac79992017 स्वभावं देहादीनां कर्तारं मन्यसे, यतः केचिदाहु :
