________________
Vada ] Ganadharavida
428. Suha-duhkhakāraṇam jai kammam kajjassa tadaņurūvam ca ! Pattamarūvam tam pi hu aha rūvim nāņurūvam to 13741 (1922) [सुख-दुःखकारणं यदि कर्म कार्यस्य तदनुरूपं च ।
प्राप्तमरूपं तदपि खल्वथ रूपि नानुरूपं ततः ॥ ३७४ ॥ (१९२२) Sukha-duḥkhakāraṇam yadi karma karyasya tadanurūpam ca 1 Prāptamarūpam tadapi khalvatha rūpi nānurūpam tataḥ 1137411 ]
Trans.-374 If karma ( were known as ) the cause of happiness and misery, and if Karya ( were taken as ) simiiar to it, then, that (i. e. karma) also would certainly become formless, and if corporeal, it would not resemble (the Karya ). ( 1922)
टीका-ननु यदि सुख-दुःखयोः पुण्य-पापात्मकं कर्म कारणम् , तच्च यदि कार्यस्य सुख-दुःखरूपस्यानुरूपं सदृशमिष्यते, तर्हि सुख-दुःखयोरात्मपरिणामत्वेनारूपत्वात् तदपि पुण्य-पापात्मकं कर्म तदनुरूपतयाऽरूपं प्रामोति । अथ रूपवत् , तर्हि नानुरूपं तत् , मूर्तत्वेन विलक्षणत्वादिति ॥ ३७४ ॥ (१९२२)
D. C.-If Karma composed of punya and pāpa is accepted as the Kārana of sukha and duhkha, and if sukha and duḥkha are taken as similar to the Karma, Karma, which in fact is corporeal, would become formless like sukha and duḥkha.
On the other hand, if it is taken as corporeal, it will not resemble its kārya, viz, sukha and duhlcha which are incorporeal. ॥ 374॥ ( 1922)
Then, the Tirthankara Bhagavān replios :न हि सबहाणुरूवं भिन्नं वा कारणं, अह मयं ते। किं कज-कारणत्तणमहवा वत्थुत्तणं तस्स ? ॥३७५॥ (१९२३) Na hi savvahānuruvam bhinnam, vā kāranam, aha mayam te | Kim kajja-kāranattanamahava vatthuttanam tassa ? ॥375u.(1923)
