Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 07 Author(s): E Hultzsch Publisher: Archaeological Survey of IndiaPage 41
________________ 30 EPIGRAPHIA INDICA. (VOL. VII. the strokes of the tusks of his rutting elephants." The god Kalapriya is the same as Mahakala, whose temple at Ujjain is so widely known all over India. It is on the occasion of the festival held in honour of this Kalapriya that the three plays of the poet Bhavabhuti were represented. It thus appears that, in his expedition of conquest in Northern India, Indra III. halted at Ujjain to pay his homage to the god. The remaining three lines may be thus rendered :"His steeds crossed the unfathomable Yamuna which rivals the sea. He completely devastated that hostile city of Mahôdaya, which is even to-day greatly renowned among men by the name of Kuśasthala.” Indra III. therefore appears to have marched from Ujjain northward, crossed the Jumna and reduced the city of Mabodaya. The lexicon of Hômachandra tells us that Mahodaya and Kusasthala are both names of Kanyakubja, 1.c. Kanauj, so that verse 19 represents Indra III. to have attacked the city of Kananj. But the complete devastation of Mahôdaya, which Indra III. is spoken of as having brought about, is merely poetical. For, the poet's object appears to be to introduce a play on the words mahôdaya and kusasthala, which in their conventional sense mean Kanauj, and in their etymological one, full of high prosperity' and ' a spot of kusa grass' respectively: Mahôdaya, i.e. Kana uj, ceased to be mahôdaya, i.e. highly prosper ous, and became kusasthala, i.e. a mere spot of kusa grass. Hence, the complete annihilation of the city of Mahôdaya or Kanauj alluded to in this stanza cannot be reasonably assumed to be a historical fact. This is also seen from the consideration that, as a matter of fact, for long after the event recorded in this verse took place, Kanauj continued to be the capital of several princes, ruling over Northern India. What Indra III. actually did beyond attacking Mahôdaya or Kannaj, cannot be inferred from the verse itself. But we can ascertain it with the help of other inscriptions. We shall, however, in the first place, see whether we can decide which of the rulers of Kanauj Indra III. vanquished. The Rashtra kuța records give the dates 915 and 917 A.D. for Indra III.; and the succession and dates of the princes, reigning at Mahôdaya or Kanauj about this period, as determined from the Gwalior, Pehca and Siyado i inscriptions, are as follows: 1. Bhôja, A.D. 862, 876 and 882. 2. Mahendrapala, A.D. 903 and 907. 3. Kshitipala or Mahîpala, A.D. 917. 4. Dêvapåla, A.D. 948.4 Now, as for Indra (III.) we have the dates A.D. 915 and 9176 and for Kshitipala or Mahipala the date A.D. 917, there can hardly be a doubt that they were contemporaries. And it is almost certain that it is this Kshitipala whom Indra III. conquered. Let us now find out what Indra III. did beyond obtaining a victory over Kshitipala. A Khajuraho 1 Jagaddhara, in his commentary on the Malatimadhava, says that Kalapriyanatha is tad-ddia-ddva-beda, i.e. a particular deity belonging to that country. But what country Jagaddhara had in his mind, cannot be accurately made out. Isvarachandra Vidyasagara, in his edition of the Uttarardmacharita, says in a footnote that Kalapriyanátha is the name of a deity installed in Padmapura in Vidarbha, i.e. the native town of the poet Bhavabhati. But this note appears to be based on the comment of Jagaddhara just quoted, and, according to Isvarachandra, it sevms that the expression tad-ddia must be understood to mean the country to which Bhavabhūti belonged. In the St. Petersburg Dictionary, however, Kalapriyanåtha is identified with the Mahakala of Vijayini, This identification doubtless fits here excellently, but I have not been able to trace the authority which supports it. ? Hémachandra's Abhidhánachintamani, v. 273 f. # The king of Mahôdays or Kapauj, whom Indra III. defeated, has been shown further on to be Kabitipals or Mahipala. And we have actual records to show that, aft's this Kshitipala, there reigned at Kanguj his successors called Devapaladeva, VijayapAladdva, Rajyapåladers and Trilochanapaladérs, respectively (see above, Vol. III. D. 265; Ind. Ant. Vol. XVIII. p. 33 ff.). They were followed by the Gaharwaras or Rathors of Kansuj (C. Mabel Duff's Chronology of India, p. 285). • See above, Vol. I. p. 171 f.; C. Mabel Duff's Chronology of India, p. 296. • Dr. Fleet's Dyn. Kan. Distr. p. 415 f.Page Navigation
1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 ... 522