Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 07
Author(s): E Hultzsch
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

Previous | Next

Page 97
________________ 78 EPIGRAPHIA INDICA. [VOL. VII. According to the Vardhapuranam Nrisimharâya's first general isvara of the Tulu family conquered the forts of (1) Udayâdri, (2) Huttari, (3) Gandikôța, (4) Penugonda, (5) Beggalûrn, (6) Kôvela-Nellûru, (7) Kundâni, (8) Goḍuguchinta, (9) Bâguru, (10) Naragonda, (11) Âmûru and (12) Srirangapaṭṭanam, and "destroyed the cavalry of the Yavanas of Beḍaudakota at Gandikota." The Yavanas referred to here are the Bahmani kings, who transferred their capital from Kulbarga to Bidar in Jane 1423 A.D., during the reign of Aḥmad Shah. Referring to the same event, the author of the Telugu poem Parijatapaharanam says that Isvara "gave rise to thousands of rivers of blood by killing the horses of the Yavanas of Beḍandakota," but he transfers the scene to Kandukuru. The Muḥammadan historians do not, of course, refer to this event. Nrisimharâya's dominions were extensive, and they probably comprised the whole of "the modern districts of North Arcot, Chingleput and Nellore, and portions at least of South Arcot, Cuddapah, Kistna and Mysore. The Vardhapuranam calls Nrisimharâya "the possessor of arms which are capable of protecting the kingdom of Karnata," which shows his connection with that kingdom. According to the same work he was one of the Sumantas or tributary princes of the Karnâța empire, and both isvara and his son Narasimha were his generals one after the other. It would appear also that Nrisim haraya was probably related to the kings of the first dynasty of the Karpâta empire, since both claimed to belong to the Yadava line of the lunar race of Kshatriyas. This description closely tallies with that given by the Portuguese chronicler Fernão Nuniz of "Narsymgua " who overthrew the first dynasty of the empire. In fact according to Nuniz there was a double usurpation of the Vijayanagara throne about this time, the first usurpation being by "Narsymgua," whom I identify with Saluva Nrisimharaya, father of Immaḍi-Nrisimha, the donor of the present grant, and the second by Nrisimharâya's general "Narsenaque" or Narasimha, the founder of the Tuluva dynasty. According to Nuniz, the following are briefly the circumstances that led to the downfall of the first and the accession of the second dynasty. The last great king of the first dynasty was Devaraya II., who ruled till about the year A.D. 1449. The next forty or fifty years saw no less than five sovereigns, all of them weak and imbecile. The last of them, whom Nuniz calls"Padea Rao," seems to have been the worst of the lot, and in his time the empire declined even more than in the time of his four immediate predecessors. It occurred to Nrisim haraya, who was the principal minister and general of the state, that a change of sovereign was necessary to prevent the kingdom from falling an easy prey to its hereditary enemy, the Bahmanî king, and, with the consent and support of the other generals and ministers, he seized the throne and kingdom, allowing the king to make his escape. Nrisimharâya died, leaving two infant sons and a general named "Narsenaque" or Narasa-Nayaka, in whom he had much confidence and whom he therefore appointed regent during the minority of his sons. In a short time Nrisimharaya's eldest son was murdered by one of Narasa-Nayaka's enemies, who wanted it to be believed that Narasa-Nayaka murdered the boy for the sake of his crown. Subsequently the second prince was murdered at the instance of Narasa-Nayaka himself, who thereupon 1 Verses 42 and 43 of the first dívása. I am not able to identify Nos. 6, 7, 8 and 9. Huttari (2) is probably Puttür in the Kârvêtinagar Estate, and Beggulûru (5) is perhaps Bangalore. No. 10 may be Naragallu (kalln means a rock' and konda a 'hill') in the Chittür taluks, where there is an cld fcrt (see the North Arcot District Manual, new edition, Vol. II. p. 349), and Âmůru (11) is evidently Gid-Amůru or Ambûrudurga in the Gudiyatam taluka. The cther places are well-known. Ind. Ant. Vol. XXVIII. p. 210. Bedandakota or Bedadakota is the fort of Bedada,' which is a corruption of Pidar. Vaijayanti Press edition of 1895, p. 10. The words Kandukuru and Gandikota suit the metre equally well, and one of the readings is necessarily incorrect. Verse 30 of the first divisa.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522