Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 48
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarkar
Publisher: Swati Publications

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 100
________________ THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY [JONE, 1919 136). He writes" .... in the absence of any evidence as to the real origin of the nakshatras, the priority of Kritikás has been insoluble. But the Babylonian hypothesis of their origin still remains the most plausible and for an ingenious argument I would refer to a comparatively recent article by Lehmann Haupt. If so, then the effort to prove the origin of the position of Kittikás by Indian literature must he unsuccessful." I have not been able to get a copy of ZDMG. (L.xvi) containing this ingenious argument. But from the way in which Prof. Keith writes I am inclined to think that he does not attach much value to it. Now that Prof. Keith has chosen to revive a theory long given up, he should, in fairness, bring together all the fresh evidence that Babylonian researches might have brought to light since 1882 and discuss their evidentiary value and at least show that the theory is not so baseless as Mexmüller had pronomced it to be. It is an important question involving wide issues and deserves more than a digressive hit that the Professor has chosen to give it. To a Jay mind it would appear that there is nothing in common betwen the Indian, eeliptic of the twenty-seven nakshatras and the Babylonian zodiac. (1) The former is lunar; the latter, by all accounts, was solar. (2) In the earliest Indian literature where it is found, taat is, the Brahmanas, there is no attempt to divide the 27 nakshatras into 12 sections and allot two or three to each section and there is no reference to the planets. "The Chaldæans chose three stars in each sign to be the Councillor gods' of the planets." (3) The first sign (whether Aries, so far as records go, or Taurus, as later traditions indicate, coincided with the vernal equinox. There is no evidence in Indian literature to show that the Indians began their year with the vernal equinox before the introduction of the Alexandrian School of astronomy into India about the fourth or the fifth century A.D. (4) There is not the slightest evidence in the Brahmaņa literature to show that the Brahmavâdins of the Brdhmana period were aware of the twelve signs of the Babylonian or the later Indian solar zodiac or any pictorial representations of these signs, such as the Ram, the Bull, etc., or that the words mesha, Vrishabha, etc., were used technically to denote the signs of a solar zodiac. (5) In Babylonia 'we find a week of seven and another of fire days' (Ency. Brit., 11th ed., Vol. 3, p. 167). The Brahmanas know neither, but have instead a period of 6 days (Skaraha), five of which made a month. (6) In Babylonia, the 12 months were named after the 12 zodiacal signs. In the Brahmaras, the 12 months are named after the 12 nakshatras at or near which the moon successively became full. (7) The Brâhmaņic asterismal system,commenced with the Pleiades. There is nothing to show that the first sign in Babylonia was headed by this asterism. Maxmüller wrote in 1882: "Now the Babylonian zodiac was solar, and, in spite of repeated researches, no trace of a lunar zodiac has been found, where so many things have been found, in the Cuneiform inscriptions. But supposing even that a Junar zodiac had been discovered in Babylon, no one acquainted with Vedic literature and with the ancient Vedic ceremonial would easily allow himself to be persuaded that the Hindus had borrowed that simple division of the sky from the Babylonians . . . . Surely it would be a senseless hypothesis to imagine that the Vedic shepherds or priests went to Babylonia in search of a knowledge which every shepherd might have acquired on the banks of the Indus ......" And after thirty years' further Balylonian research and exploraljon, the · Encyclopædia Britannica (edition of 1911, art: "Zodiao"). Vide, for instance, the Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, July 1917, p. 499, footnote :".... Only the Roman Calendar and the year of Nabonidus rockon from the spring. Dr. Fleet thought that BrAbmans Inust have visited Rome. Perhaps so; but it is more probable, rthink, that they took the spring equinox for their starting point from the year of Nabonidus. When the Alexandrian astronomers reformed their Calendar in the reign of Diocletian, they based their reform upon the Nabonidus era; and these astronomers were the teachers of the Indians." India-What Can It Teach Us? (first edition, pp. 126, ete.)

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458