Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 48
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarkar
Publisher: Swati Publications

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 148
________________ 144 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY [ August, 1919 dent ruler-from all Eastern Chalukya genealogies, the notice of Räjiga (a shortened form of Rajendrachôļa in Bilhana's Vikramåókadêvacharita 28 as the lord of Vêugi' just before his accession to the Chola throne and more than all the enigma "of Rajendrachốla II's position # the disputod succession were allowed, all these taken together go to discredit entirely the story of the disputed succession and prove that the uncle and the nephew were on the best terms possible without any ill-will between them. If Viranâjêndra really conquered Veigi as the inscription affirms, then it passes one's understanding why he should have contented himself merely with the status quo of an allegiance and why he should not have annexed in accordance with his former resolve-a country so valuable from a diplomatic standpoint and anticipated the work of Rajendrachốla II or Kulottuiga I by a few years by bringing the two crowns, Vôngi and Chola under one rule, embracing the whole eastern Eeaboard. Matters do not seem to have been so entirely favourable to Virarajendra as the inscription boasts and the alleged conquest and bestowal of Veigf on Vijayaditya must betaken cum grano salis.30 Our suspicions are only increased by the Ganga grant published by Fleet wherein Râjarâja of Kalinganagara (A.D. 1068 1076), the son-in-laws of Râjêndrachôla II, is said to have come to the relief of the said Vijayaditya "the waning lord of Vêigi when beginning to grow old, he left Vêigi, as if he were a sun leaving the western sky and was about to sink in the great ocean of the Chôdas." This Chôja danger. oould not have been from Rajendrachôla II (Kulôttuuga), as Dr. Hultzsch33takes it, but could have been only from Virarâjêndra. Virarajêndra, far from being a protector of Vijayaditya, as would appear from the Manima galam inscription, must have been the very person that threatened his kingdom with annexation for his desertion of the Chola allegiance and change of sides. The truth was when VijayAditya, the deputy of Vengi, was hard pressed by Virarajêndra with annexation about A.D. 1067 and could not defend himself singly, Vikramaditya, who for years was working in the north against his enemy Viraråjendra and who was perhaps the root cause of Viia. yâditya's desertion, came to his rescue, went to Chakrakôïta and Kaligaragara ard easily formed a triple alliance with the kings of those countries who saw a merace to their own state in the annihilation or annexation of Vengî by Virarâjêndra. Virarajendra tried though * VI, 26. 29 Rajendrachola Il could not have remained in Vengt if Vijayaditya his enemy had been rein. stated on its throne, nor could he have remained in the Choa dominions for Virarájéndra, the ally of Vijayaditya, would keep him out. Where, then, was Rajendra Il down to his socession to the Chola throne? Vide my forthcoming article on "The Life and Times of Kulottunga" wherein this question will be more fully threshed out. * Vide part III, infra. * Ind. Ant., XVIII, No. 178. Vizag, copper-plate "grant of Anantavarman Chodagangadava Rajaraja's agramahishi was Rajasundarf, the daughter of Rajendrachola, Ind. Ans., XVIII, No. 179; Vizag, oopper plate grant of Anantavarman Chôdagangadēva" Rajaraja of Kalinganagan wedded Rajasundart, the daughter of the Choda king.' * Ind. An., XVID, Nos. 178 and 179.-The Vijayaditya here referred to cannot be, as sugreeted by the late Mr. BhattanAtha Svemin (Ind. Ant, XLI, 217), the half-brother of Vikramaditya who was young, but can only be the uncle of Rajendrachļa IT, who was old. Vanapati's inscription (Epi. Ind., IV. 314, 311) and Anantavarman's grant (Ind. Ant, XVIII), which apparently contradict each other need not necessarily refer to the same fact as has been assumed. SII., III. Dr. Hultaach's opinion is from the standpoint of the disputed succession between Vijayaditya'the uncle and Rajendrachla II (Kulottunga) the nephew which was proved to be non-existent. Vido supra. So it is untenable. Vide also Ind. Ant. XLI, 218.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458