________________ Pancastikaya-samgraha (vyapadesa), the shape (samsthana), the count (samkhya), and the subject (visaya). To call the man with 'wealth' (dhana) as the 'possessor-of-wealth' (dhani) is the convention based on distinctness (prthaktva). The 'knowledge' (jnana) and the 'possessor-of-knowledge' (jnani) exhibit oneness (ananyapana) in terms of the name (or form-ofspeech) (vyapadesa), the shape (samsthana), the count (samkhya), and the subject (visaya). To call the man with knowledge' (jnana) as the "possessor-of-knowledge' (jnani) is the convention based on oneness (ekatva). द्रव्य और गुण सदा भिन्न-पदार्थभूत हों तो दोष आयेगा - Fault if the substance (dravya) is considered eternally distinct from the quality (guna) - णाणी णाणं च सदा अत्यंतरिदा दु अण्णमण्णस्स / दोण्हं अचेदणत्तं पसजदि सम्मं जिणावमदं // 48 // ज्ञानी ज्ञानं च सदार्थांतरिते त्वन्योऽन्यस्य / द्वयोरचेतनत्वं प्रसजति सम्यग् जिनावमतम् // 48 // अन्वयार्थ - [ ज्ञानी] यदि ज्ञानी (आत्मा) [च] और [ ज्ञानं) ज्ञान [ सदा] सदा [अन्योऽन्यस्य] परस्पर [अर्थांतरिते तु] अर्थान्तरभूत (भिन्नपदार्थभूत) हों तो [द्वयोः ] दोनों को [अचेतनत्वं प्रसजति ] अचेतनपने का प्रसंग आ जाये, [ सम्यग् जिनावमतम् ] ऐसा जिन भगवान् का सम्यक् मत है। If the 'possessor-of-knowledge' (jnani or atma) and the 'knowledge' (jnana) are considered eternally distinct (arthantara) from each other then both - the 'possessorof- knowledge' (jnani or atma) and the knowledge (jnana) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
