Book Title: Panchastikay Sangraha With Authentic Explanatory Notes in English
Author(s): Vijay K Jain
Publisher: Vikalp Printers

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 278
________________ Pancastikaya-samgraha engender wrong-belief (mithyadarsana) and are ever engaged, due to attachment, etc., in pleasures of the senses, do not tread this worthy path to liberation. Here, let us understand the concepts of association (anvaya) and distinction (uyatireka). That in whose presence the effect (karya) takes place is association (anvaya). That in whose absence the effect (karya) does not take place is distinction (vyatireka). This is explained further: The middle-term (hetu) has both - association (anvaya) and distinction (vyatireka) - with the major-term (sadhya). Association (anvaya) establishes the homogeneousness (sadharmya), and distinction (uyatireka) the heterogeneousness (vaidharmya) with the major-term (sadhya). Association (anvaya) establishes the logical connection (vyapti) by positivity: "The hill is full of fire (major-term) because it is full of smoke (middle-term), as a kitchen," - the presence of the major-term (sadhya) is attended by the presence of the middleterm (hetu or sadhana) - presence-in-homologue (sadharmya). Distinction (vyatireka) establishes the logical connection by contrariety: "The hill has no smoke (major-term) because it has no fire (middle-term), as a lake," - the absence of the major-term (sadhya) is attended by the absence of the middle-term (hetu or sadhana) - absence-in-heterologue (vaidharmya). Homogeneousness (sadharmya) and heterogeneousness (vaidharmya) are relative to each other and always go together. The middleterm (hetu) is qualified by both - homogeneousness (sadharmya) and heterogeneousness (vaidharmya). Smoke has invariable togetherness (avinabhava) with fire: smoke means existence of fire, and there is no smoke without fire. Fire, on the other hand, has no invariable togetherness (avinabhava) with smoke as there can be fire without smoke. It cannot be said that fire must have smoke, and that without smoke there is no fire. But existence and non-existence have mutual (ubhaya) invariable togetherness (avinabhava); non-existence is always accompanied by existence and existence is always accompanied by non-existence. This is because existence and non-existence, both, are qualifying attributes @ @ . . . .. . . . . . . . . 206

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436