Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 08
Author(s): E Hultzsch
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

Previous | Next

Page 61
________________ EPIGRAPHIA INDICA. [VOL. VIII. No. 7.-CHIKMAGALUR INSCRIPTION OF RACHAMALLA III.; OF THE PERIOD A.D. 989-1005. BY J. F. FLEET, I.C.S. (Retd.), PH.D., C.I.E. Chikmagalur, or more precisely Chikka-Magasûr, is the head-quarters town of the Kadur district, and of the Chikmagalur taluks of that district, in Mysore. In the Indian Atlas sheet No. 43, N.E. (1892), it is shewn as Chikmagalur,' in lat. 13° 19', long. 75° 50'. In the present record, as in some others, it is mentioned as Kiriya-Muguli," the smaller or junior Muguli." The Piriya-Muguli, or "larger or senior Magali," of the record, is the modern Hirêmagaļür or Hire-Magalar, shewn in the Atlas sheet as simply Magalur,' about one mile east-by-south from Chikmagalur; in an inscription of A.D. 959 (P 958) at Uppahalli (Ep. Oarn. Vol. VI., Cm. 42; regarding the date, see note l on page 56 below), Piriya-Mugaļi seems to be referred to as simply Muguļi. Local imagination, as reported by Mr. Rice in his Mysore, revised edition, Vol. II, pp. 879, 395, 396, would account for the names by alleging that one village was the dowry of the eldest daughter (hirê-magalu, piriya-magal), and the other was the dowry of a younger daughter (chakka-magalu, kiriya-magal), of the epic king Rukmangada, whose capital is locally supposed to have been Sakardypatna or Sakkarêpatņa, a village about thirteen miles towards the north-east of Chikmagalûr. But it is quite plain that that idea is based upon nothing but the modern corrupted form of the essential name of the two places, namely magaļúr for muguliyür. And, as has practically been already suggested by Mr. Rice (loc. cit. p. 379), the original name is no doubt to be attributed to a local abundance of the muguļi-tree, Acacia suma. The insoription, which is on a stone standing on the north of the kalyani, apparently & square pond with steps on all sides, in the fort at Chikmagalur, has been published by Mr. Rice in his Ep. Carn. Vol. VI. (1901), Kadür district, Cm. 3, transliterated texts p. 95, translations p. 35, Kanarege texts p. 154. I now edit it, partly from the Kanarese text, and partly from a photograph which Mr. Rice kindly sent me in December, 1899. The photograph is not as distinct as an ink-impression or an estampage would be. But it shews quite clearly all the historically important part of the record, lines 1 to 7. And it soffices, with the help of the Kanarese text, to make the decipherment of the remainder satisfactory, except in respect of & very few doubtful syllables which I have placed in square brackets with queries attached to them. A coording to the entry above Mr. Rice's Kanarese text, the size of the stone is 2' 6" broad by 5'0' high. - The photograph shews, above the writing, an elephant, which must be about 1'3" high, standing to the right (proper left): its trunk hangs straight down, almost to the ground, with the tip tarned op inwards; and it seems to have & sarcingle, like the elephant above the Peggûr inscription of A.D. 978, Ind. Ant. Vol. VI. p. 101, No. I, and Plate opposite Coorg Insors, p. 7.--The area covered by the writing must be about 3' 3" high. It is somewhat irregular in shape; and, if we understand that 2' 6" is its extreme breadth, then in line 1 it is about 1'9' broad, and the breadth gradually increases to the full measure of 2' 6' in line 11 or 12, and maintains that measure as far as the end. The writing seems sufficiently well preserved for a good ink-impression or estampage to make the whole of it quite legible without any doubt.- The characters are Kanarese, boldly formed and evidently well executed. And they are of a type which is fairly referable to any time about A.D. 1000. Of the usual testletters, the kin is absent; then, which ooours four times, in lines 9, 10, 12, and 16, and the j, b, and 1, are all of the fully developed later type. The initial short i cours four times, in innugu for innúru, line 9, in inta, line 12, in i (for) kodanigeyan, line 12, and in indavúrada, line 16; and in each case it is of the fully developed later type: the importance of this paleographic

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398