Book Title: Pravachansara
Author(s): Vijay K Jain
Publisher: Vikalp Printers

Previous | Next

Page 107
________________ Pravacanasara ways past, present and future modes (paryaya); origination (utpāda), destruction (vyaya) and permanence (dhrauvya); substance (dravya), quality (guna) and mode (paryaya). Further, since the substances - the soul (jiva) and the non-soul (ajiva) – undergo modification, the above modes of expression are used. 46 Explanatory Note: The previous verse (gāthā) expounds that the soul (ātmā, jīva) is the knowledge (jñāna). And the soul itself, without outside help, knows the self as well as the other objects-ofknowledge (jñeya) through its own modification of the knowledge. No other substance has this knowledge. The substance, which is expressed in three ways past, present and future modes; origination (utpada), destruction (vyaya) and permanence (dhrauvya); and substance (dravya), quality (guna) and mode (paryaya) - is worth knowing by the soul. The soul, like the lamp, illumines the self as well as the others and, therefore, is the objectof-knowledge (jñeya) as well as the knowledge (jñāna). The remaining five substances - the medium of motion (dharma), the medium of rest (adharma), the space (ākāśa), the matter (pudgala), and the time (kāla) - have no knowledge (jñāna) but are the objects-of-knowledge (jñeya). How can the soul know itself? It knows itself like the lamp, which illumines the self as well as the others. How does the soul know the objects-of-knowledge (jñeya)? The knowledge (jñāna) as well as the objects-of-knowledge (jñeya) undergo modification, and the modification of the knowledge (jñāna) is with help of the objects-of-knowledge (jñeya). With help of the objects-ofknowledge (jñeya), the knowledge (jñāna) knows; if there were no objects-of-knowledge (jñeya), whom will the knowledge (jñāna) know? With help of the knowledge (jñāna), the objects-ofknowledge (jñeya) are known; if there were no knowledge (jñāna), who will know the objects-of-knowledge (jñeya)? There is this eternal relationship between the objects-of-knowledge (jñeya) and the knowledge (jñāna). ........ -

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407