Book Title: Sambodhi 1984 Vol 13 and 14
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, Ramesh S Betai, Yajneshwar S Shastri
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad
View full book text
________________
Nilanjana S. Shah
is incomplete. Thus, the word ach can be formed by aie and tien in can be applied to it by the sūtra 4.1.5 to derive the word a.
Sarañadeva himself justifies it on the basis of 701418. As fan is an ano, the word 8 can be included in it and then by faraufa*7(4.1.41) we can apply it to eat and derive the word acat.
In the following case, he even goes to the extent of setting a side Maitreya's opinion about the gift of a certain Vārtika, in order to justify the explanation given by Jayamangala.
In the following verse of Bhattikavya, at 1996: gpadariarsafazaie (2.10), the word gee has been used as an attribute of tha wind. It was well-scented due to the contact with aravinda-lotuses.
Jayamangala explains the word 8174: on the bases of the Vartika गन्धस्यत्वे तदेकान्तग्रह पम्. The word एकान्त is explained in two ways, one explanation is 3179941, i.e., 779 is changed to me in the sense of smell and not in the sense of perfume. Another explanation of lia is 124, i. e., when the fragrance is natural, 74 is changed to ha ve
Jayamangala makes it clear that in this verse 17 being not natural, is not changed to गन्धि. While commenting on the Vārtika एवे चानियोगे (6.1.94), Maitreya considers the above Vārtika FETE etc. also as .
Sarañadeva is not willing to agree with Maitreya. He argues, if the Vactika is considered gif, the explanation given by Jayanangala based on it would be rendered futile.
Jayamangala has raised the problem that in the following line of Bhatti : 941 46177 H: 64 (10.19) 1, there should be as by the sutra झलां जशोऽन्ते (5.2.39) in the word मरुत्वान्, i.e., it should be मरुद्वान्,
Saranadeva meets his criticism by pointing out that before मतुब्, मत् is designated as 'H' according to aa Heat (1.4 19) and then this will bar q*(1.4.17). Hence, gai asià' will not apply because of 25T will not be at the end of a 98.
The following viewpoint of Jayamangala, noted by Saraṇadeva with reference to 37%aagtutu: (19.22) is not found in the commentary now available to us.
Bhatti has employed the form 48ày: which is not correct according to 3fèquart: TU: (2 4.72). The sūtra enjoins that there is elision of vikaraṇa 919 in the case of roots beginning with 37 etc. Accordingly, th: potential third person plural form should be B : Saraanadeva