Book Title: Sambodhi 1984 Vol 13 and 14
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, Ramesh S Betai, Yajneshwar S Shastri
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad
View full book text
________________
Nilanjana S. Shah
Saranadeva remarks that since the word gaar is enlisted in the 16.fano, we can apply the sutra 1161479 14.1.96) here and add suffix est to सुमित्रा toget सामान and then the vocative singular would be सौमिगे.
Bhatti has applied the affix aid after 399992 in the word het: and खत्त: occurring respectively in the verses मा दर्शतान्य भरत' च मत्त: (3.15 and
dagat are mana: (18.29). But according to the sūtra 81914 चाहीयकहोः, the affix तासि can come after only अपादानपञ्चमी.
To justify these usage, Saraṇadeva offers two solutions. One way is to resort to Yogavibhaga, i.e. to split the sutra afegit qaxrleafè (5.4.44) into two parts and then to apply ale to 379a45aut. The other way is to apply the Vārtika, as guarari 3196417 (on 5.4.44), because 2014 is an 21ste .
Sometimes Saranadeva himself derives 1995 from the sutras or the Vārtikas and then on the basis of these 1965, be justifies the following usages of Bhatti :
The accusative case employed by Bhatti for af1af :) in the verse : Carigral...9417 41967 af: 341 ...9147731 40 (9.67) is not correct according to the sūtra nagla.. Afhaaf (1.4.52), as 8 is not a 7740 91 denoting talaar ma.
To justify this case, Saraṇadeva derives the 196 from the Vårtika 789 g Hits: 1991 afa54: con- 1.4.52) that qua nfà can be a falta for 461. In this case, denotes garaan vita, hence the accusative case for wat is justified. In the verses of Bhattikavya
acha CAT (2.21), and ETTA EHA (6.80), genetive case should have been used instead of the accusative case, for the words to and BA resp. acc. to the sūtra ** : Kia (2.3.65).
To justify this, Sarañadeva derives the 119# from the sūtra, (5.1.117). It means that the affix afa comes after a word in the accusative case, in construction, in the sense of befitting.
On the basis of this $147, Saraṇadava remarks that the genetive case is not compulsory.
The following usages of Bhattikavya have been justified on the basis of diga, 1.c, the presence of the word again the particular sütras. 2156 is the application of a grammatical rule as a necessity to arrive
