________________
63
(P. 66. A. 1. S. 23.
this direct meaning. This is called the suggested sense ( 2267 )--the soul of poetry--which is obtained by the function of sugar alone (a function of words and sense - different from अभिधा and लक्षणा.)
This gator91T has been a bone of contention for almost all the rhetoricians. Some are against the conception of such a novel process to arrive at the suggested sense and try either to stretch the power of sfar up to this suggested sense (for instance the well-known dictum "HISSÀgifta sigaraatian917:”) or to include this par under GeoT ( as being a part of it.)
Others are the advocotes of 5997731917 and try to prove that the function of Jai cannot possibly be discharged either by slet or I. These are called ध्वनिवादिन्s the pioneer of whom is आनन्दवर्धन the famous author of ध्वन्यालोक. मम्मट the author of काव्यप्रकाश is also a powerful champion of व्यञ्जना. महिमभट्ट ( the author of oftras ) is the greatest opponent of this 32391 school.
Our author has faithfully followed 311977ata and AFAT and advanced the stock arguments used by these two authors in defence of war. These are already given in detail on page 50, 51, 52.
It should be noted here that the contention is not about the inner meaning of a sentence or a poemfor all agree in regarding it as the most important, one, but it is about the gatalart. The whole controversy centres round this point.
The main arguments in favour of 54991, as advanced by hala here are as under :
(i) fut cannot express the inner meaning, for it has power to express only the direct meaning of words on the strength of convention (ET). But as
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
