________________
147
(P. 239. A. 3. S. 6.
When however the incompalibility of two things compared, leads to a deliberate censure—it is no fault, as in 329 the moon is rightly condemned as a cruel untouchable, for she kills love-lorn ladies.
Thus we see that all cases of impropriety fall under this head अनुचितार्थ.
Thus in 331 which means:- This mountain (FERLET) protects the darkness concealed like an owl in its caverns. The great regard persons who seek protection as their own. The figure 87971-a71e here is needless, for it is not necessary to support a conceit which is professedly a conceit.
In the verse 332 the king is compared to a weaver weaving cloth, but it is said that in spite of this, his fame is without cloth, and hence the fault.
mfangra occurs when the words are jarring to the ears. This fault is peculiar to syllables.
For instance, in 333 wafezig is a jarring word.
Similarly in 334 afore and alare harsh words. But when the words fit in with the speaker, there is no fault; for instance, in the verse 335 the speaker is a grammarian and, therefore may use such jarring words uits, feature etc.
The words 871977 3141914 used in the verse 336 are quite all right, for the verse is addressed to a grammarian. Similarly the hard-sounding words in the third line of the verse 337 are all quite right, for the context is the description of a lion.
Similarly the harsh and jarring words in the verse 338 are all appropriate, for the verse is an illustration of the sentiment of loathing (HR) which requires a style full of jarring words.
In the verse 339 the description of a shaken tree
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
