________________
P. 401. A. 6. S. 31. )
232
694. Of course ETF pervades throughout the verse, but a part of it is also found in the compound and the Er is 1997.
A question here arises as to what criterion is there to decide that a particular figure is TOETSEIT and another figure is perfaser, for in every figure, be it अर्थालङ्कार or शब्दालङ्कार, both the sense and the word are present invariably. Both these (sense and word ) are indispensable to a sentence. Thus, at the most, we can say that every figure is उभयालङ्कार. To this हेमचन्द्र's answer is as follows:
Not only in the case of figures but even in the case of sta (faults in poetry ) go ( excellences in poetry ) there is a definite classification of (i) those pertaining to words and (ii) those pertaining to sense; and in all those classifications the only criterion is this:---(i) If by omitting a particular word or words the figure disappears, then that figure is a 3521381.
On the other hand (ii) if by altering the sense of a word the figure disappears, then that figure is a figure of sense, that is 37919ert.
And (iii) if for a particular figure a particular word and a particular sense are both indispensable the figure is 32lmak.
But even in 34917IT, we can observe as to whether, in that particular instance, the word is important or the sense and decide accordingly. ...Thus the criterion to decide whether a particular figure pertains to word or sense is the method of of अन्वयव्यतिरेक i. e. अन्वय ( positive concomittance) and alate ( negative concomittance ).
यत्र यत्र अमुकः शब्द तत्र तत्र अलङ्कारः यत्र यत्र न अमुकः शब्दः तत्र तत्र नालङ्कारः ..
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
