________________
159 P. 272. A. 3. S. 9. ] yield double meaning, in "q9T1FMFÆ etc.” Tio (red) is a vague statement, but to say that it is no ga (only red) is wrong.
In the verse 417 which means:--"Don't despise these jewels-Oh Ocean! for one of them obliged Vishnu to beg you," a general statement is the proper statement, but instead of that, “lega fafea: " is a particular statement made-this is wrong.
Exactly opposite is the case in the verse 418 : here II (moon-lit night) is the particular word that is wanted, but instead of this the word 9147 (a night in general) is used.
Similarly in 419 fazlagi taha is an adjective of falcao ( blue lotus ) but it ought to have been used predicatively, for the context requires it to be so.
Again in 420 in which 31479rat takes a vow of killing all the qreas in one night, 570 is used as a predicate, while in fact it ought to form part of the subject; the word 9779ffetfaa:, again, goes with the subject, but in reality it ought to be the predicatethus there is a double fault. The faults of q, part of a q etc. are not mentioned by A7= obviously because they are easy to detect. When there is anything faulty used in course of imitating a person ( by way of creat. ing humour ) etc., there is no fault.
When proper persons speak in a proper manner (even though it may appear unintelligible, absurd, indecent etc. to others ) it is no fault. Sometimes it lends positive charm to the poems. The illustrations are already given by 2495 in this chapter. Here he draws attention of the readers to the exceptional cases where a fault (in ordinary cases ) is no fault at all,
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
