________________
17161. A. 3. S. 2. )
116
to have been mentioned by words. But here the word Bitegah is necessary, therefore, the mention of ourHTA by word does not offend so much.
विभाव, अनुभाष etc. of a rival रस mar a रस, if they are mentioned,
(1) in a manner in which they are not checked. (2) in one and the same 811944. (3) side by side.
(4) without being subordinated to the principal T. In all these four cases the poetic fault is manifest. For instance, in the verse 186 the statement that " the deer in the form of time is fleeting and once gone never returns ” is directly prejudicial to the ki sentiment which is predominant in this verse; for the statement creates an atmosphere of nate by its reference to the transitoriness of things in this world. The chief sentiment here is rare, but it is marred by the statement of transitoriness which is the विभाव of शान्तरस.
Here the mi is marred by fašis also the anfaa of a. Thus it is an instance of fair share also. In the verse “farmacaot a qêt ofaa Tani
सकलपरिहारहृदया वनगमनमेव महति वधूः ।" A young woman saw her lover (paramour ) when she was in the midst of elderly persons. But because she wanted to avoid them all, she was ready to go to the forest.
Here (AREN ) abandoning everything and (990 ) going to the forests are the indicators (12417) of math ( sentiment of quietude), and as such are prejudicial to the development of IT. Of course, if ganha i. e. going to the forest is to be interpreted as going for the sake of bringing fuel etc., then there is no fault.
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
