Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 16
Author(s): John Faithfull Fleet, Richard Carnac Temple
Publisher: Swati Publications

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 94
________________ 82 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY. [MARCH, 1887. The circumstances of this fortnight furnish are. Chaitra, thirty; Vaisakha, thirty; and a pointed confirmation of my statement, at Jyêshtba, twenty-nine. page 42 above, that the results obtainable from Of course it will be found that innumer. Gen. Cunningham's and Mr. Cowasjee Patell' s able dates will work out correctly from the Tables ---or from any other Tables, the calcu- Tables in question. But the difference of one lations from which have to be based on the day, pointed out above, in respect of Jyêshtha supposition that each lunar fortnight of the (in Southern India; or, in Northern India, Hindu year covers a certain unvarying number Ashảdha) krishna 1, is quite sufficient in of solar days,-can only be accepted as closely itself, apart from the fact that numberless approximate results. other similar instances might be quoted, -to Sappose we have, in a Hindu book or in- establish my position that the results obtainable scription, the record of Saka-Samvat 1800, the from such Tables are only to be taken as month Jyêshtha (in Southern India; or, in approximately correct; though they are of conNorthern India, the following month, Ashâdha), siderable use, as giving by easy and quick the dark fortnight, the first tithi, Sanivara or means, clues as to the dates for which correct Saturday. It is required to find, by means of results may be established by more accurate their Tables, the corresponding English date. processes. By both the Tables, Saka-Sarvat 1800 As might be expected, references to so excepshould commence, -as in the Native alma- tional an occurrence as a lunar fortnight of nacs,-on Wednesday, the 3rd April, A.D. thirteen solar days, are to be found in Sans1876. The tithi in question should fall on the kşit literature. seventy-fifth solar day of the year. And the Mr. Sh. B. Dikshit has drawn my attention result would be Sunday, the 16th June. But, to the following verses in the Mahabharata, owing to preceding expunctions and repeti- Bhishmaparva, adhaya iii, vv. 28, 32, 33, in the tions, the tithi in question really fell on the speech of Vyása to Dhritarashtra, shortly seventy-fourth solar day of the year; viz. before the commencement of the war between Saturday, the 15th June. And there would the Pandavas and the Kauravas, in which he have been a difference of two days, instead of describes a number of phenomena and evil one; but that the preceding month, Vaisakha, omens, indicative of the great slaughter that renlly consisted of thirty solar days, -instead there would be in the war :of only twenty-nine, as should be the case in Chandr-adityåv=ubhau grastây= accordance with the theoretical arrangement of ek-ahna hi trayodasim the months given in the Tables in question. &-parvaņi grahan yatau A later date in the same year,—the month praja-samkshayam=ichchhatah | 28 Åshadha, the bright fortnight (southern and Chaturdasim panchadasim northern), the first tithi, Chandravåra or Mon- bhůta-půrvậm cha shodasim day,-works out correctly by the same Tables ; imam tu n-abhijânê=bam= with the result of Monday, the 1st July. But L amåvåsyam trayodasim this is only because it happens to occopy its | chandra-sûryâv=abhau grastáv= theoretically normal place on the ninetieth @ka masim trayodasim 11 32 solar day of the year. This, however, is in A-parvaņi grahên-aitau consequence of an arrangement of the preced- prajâh samkshapayishyataḥ ing months different from the theoretical one måsa-varshan panas-tîvramgiven by Gen. Cunningham and Mr. C. Patell. asît-krishna-trayodasimi According to them, Chaitra should include sônitair=vaktra-sampurņå thirty solar days; Vaisakha, 'twenty-nine; and a-triptas-tatra ráksbasih II 33 Jyêshtha, thirty. Whereas, -following the (V. 28.) “The moon and the sun were both southern arrangement,--the actual numbers eclipsed on the same day, during the thirteenth I should remark, however, that Gen. Cunningham's But it seems to be based on the fact that on the book, as published, gives Thursday, the 4th April. But, amdudoyd, when alone a solar eclipse can take place, in the copy given by him to me, he has corrected this the sun and the moon are together, and on the supposi. entry into Wednesday, the 3rd April tion that Raha, who in Hinda mythology causes eclipses, • This, of course, is purely imaginative occurrence. swallowed, on this occasion, both the sun and the

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408