Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 16
Author(s): John Faithfull Fleet, Richard Carnac Temple
Publisher: Swati Publications

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 110
________________ 98 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY. (MARCH, 1887. Bigi who was married to Jingui, son of the depended upon popular election, the theory chief of the Onguts. (iv), Tumalun who married being doubtless that an unfit man, even if Shenkku or Jiku Garkan, son of Alchi Noyan entitled by birth, could thus be excluded. The 1 chief of the Kunkuruts. (v), Altalun who rule of succession again, as is generally the married Taiju or Baiju Kurkan, chief of the case with nomadic peoples among whom it is Olkhonuts." inconvenient to be ruled by infants, prescribed By his Merkit wife Khulan, Chinghiz had that a man should be succeeded by his brothers & son, Kulkan, who left descendants. By if fit, in turn, and when these are exhausted Yisukat, one of his Tåtar wives, he left a son then the son of the eldest brother becomes the Ujaur called Chawur by Von Hammer, who patriarch of the family or the tribe, or the died when young." By & Naiman concubine nation. This rule did not apparently apply, he had, according to Rashidu'd-din, a son, however, to the heritage carved out by a man's Jurjetai or Jurjeai or Jarjin as Raverty reads own sword. In such a case his brothers were the name, who died before his other son. And excluded, and the inheritance passed to his by a Tatar concubine, another son named sons in succession. This was apparently Urhjaghan; he died young." the law. In the case of strong rulers, and Besides those Chinghiz had two adopted sons especially of rulers with such an exceptional who were treated almost on an equality with position as Chinghiz Khân, it was frequently his actual children. One of these was the Tatar the custom for them to select their heir, which Shiki Khutuku. He used to style Chinghiz choice was generally ratified by the Kuriltai Ijeh, i.e. Father, and Burteh Fujin, Berikan Ekeh, or Grand Assembly of the nation. Thus and also Sain Ekeh. Chingbiz called him Chinghiz passed over his two elder sons and Aka. He ranked with Chinghiz Khân's other selected the third one Ogotai to succeed him as Bons, and sat above Mangu his grandson." Khakan or Imperator over the Mongol world; A second adopted son of Chinghiz was the a heritage which Ogotai considerably enlarged, Tangut Chakan, also called Ujijhan, who was before he died. His brothers were his depen. captured when a boy, adopted by Burteh Fujin dents. If the Mongol Empire had been smaller and eventually commanded Chinghiz Khan's and more compact this might have continued, life-guards. but the very size of the empire speedily made Among no race probably is there such a keen it easy for those, who thought their ancestors distinction made between those who belong to had been deprived of their rightfal heritage the royal caste and the Karajus or subjects, as to strike blows which eventually shattered among the Mongols. Thatone of the latter should it. This is, however, no part of our present thrust himself into a position of sovereignty would subject. I have treated of it at great length be virtually unprecedented. On the other hand, elsewhere. Mamong most nomad peoples, the chief's right (To be continued.) SIRPUR COPPER-PLATE GRANT OF THE MAHARAJA RUDRADASA. BY PANDIT BHAGWANLAL INDRAJI, PH.D. The subject of this paper is a fragmentary broken away, pretty evenly, all the way down, copper-plate, which Mr. J. M. Campbell, Bo. and, judging by the context of lines 1 and C.S., C.I.E., kindly sent to me in 1884. I 2, two or three letters have been lost here understand that he got it from Mr. J. A. at the beginning of each successive line. There Baines, Bo.C.S., who again, obtained it from is no ring-hole in the plate; but there may have Môtiram Pațil of Sirpur in the Khandesh been one in the portion that is broken away; District. and there must have been one, if, as seems The remnant of the plate measures about likely, this is only the remnant of an original 7" by 4". It is intact at the top and bottom, set of two or more plates. The inscription is and at the right side; but at the left side it is on only one side of the plate. But on the other Erdmann, Temudachin, p. 201... id. 6. 12. note 356. Von Hammer, Ilkhaus, * Soo Erdmann, Temudschin, p. 146 and note 852 table 5.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408