Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 19
Author(s): John Faithfull Fleet, Richard Carnac Temple
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 156
________________ 142 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY. [MAY, 1890. Paulisa-Siddhanta, and which is 42 palas in excess of the year of the Romaka-Siddhanta. It is clear, therefore, that these two Siddhântas differ much from each other in the most fundamental principle; and it is impossible that they can have been written by one and the same Lâța. They were, therefore, only commented on by Lâța, and are evidently much older than him and than Varâhamihira. On reading the Pañchasiddhantikd and Brahmagupta's Brahma-Siddhanta, anyone will see at once that both of them make a clear distinction between the five Siddhântas, - Paulisa, Romaka, Vasishtha, Saura, and Paitâmaha, on the one hand, and on the other, the works of Aryabhata and others. Neither of them gives the names of the authors of the five Siddhântas, but they treat them as of divine origin. Such is not the case with other works. I have given above (page 138) seven names of human authors as occurring in the Brahma-Siddhanta. But Brahmagupta mentions them all, only to find fault with them. The same may be said of Varâhamihira. He mentions five of the above seven who preceded him, and does not hesitate to censure them, though he is much less severe than Brahmagupta in his attacks. On the other hand, the very fact that the chief object of the Pañchasiddhántiká is to give the purport of the five Siddhântas, and that Brahmagupta mentions them, as is seen from passages (b) and (c) above, to support his own statement, shows in what respect and reverence they were held in those times. The very names Saura and Paitâmaha, the works which have come from the Sun (as a god) and Brahman,' show the belief of their divine origin. And it could not be the effect of few years. Some centuries must have elapsed before their real authors were forgotten, and they came to be regarded as divine works. The length of the year of the original Rómaka-Siddhanta is certainly that of Hipparchus. And there is reason to believe that this Romaka-Siddhanta was based on his theories and tables of the sun and moon. It was Ptolemy who " established the theory of the planets/in accordance with the principles of that astronomer (Hipparchus)." And the fact that the original Rômaka-Siddhanta, as represented in the Pañchasiddhantiká, contains calculations of only the sun and the moon, and not of the planets, greatly tends to show that its author did not know Ptolemy's work on astronomy; an inference that could, I believe, be proved also by comparing the elements of the original Rómaka-Siddhanta with those of Ptolemy, though at present I am not able to make the comparison. Ptolemy's work cannot have come into existence in the time of the author of the original Rômaka-Siddhanta; otherwise, instead of the work of Hipparchus, that of Ptolemy would have come to India, and would have become the basis of the original Rómaka-Siddhanta. It may even be said that probably Ptolemy's work never came to India at all in early times. At any rate Hipparchus's length of the year, and his principles of calculating the places of the sun and the moon, must have come to India before the time of Ptolemy. And my present conclusion is that the latest possible date for the original RómakaSiddhanta, which itself, as shown by some indications, is the latest of the five Siddhântas, - is A.D. 150. -- ▲ Rômaka or Rômasa Siddhânta is extant in the present day. But I cannot say at present whether it is the same as, or different from, Srishêņa's work. I have a copy of it. It contains about 375 verses in the Anushṭubh metre, divided into 11 chapters called Adhikaras. In almost all its elements it agrees with the present Surya-Siddhantu. SANSKRIT AND OLD-KANARESE INSCRIPTIONS. BY J. F. FLEET, Bo.C.S., M.R.A.S., C.I.E. No. 186.-BALAGAMVE STONE INSCRIPTION OF THE TIME OF VINAYADITYA. This inscription was originally brought to notice by Colonel Henry Dixon, H. M.'s 22nd Regiment M. N. I., in his photographic collection, published in 1865, of inscriptions on stone and 15 See Grant's History of Physical Astronomy, Introduction, p. iii.; also p. 439.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510