________________
I ADHYAYA, I PÂDA, 1.
27
order than those which speak of Brahman as having qualities. Thus everything is settled.
The text Taitt. Up. II, 1 refers to Brahman as
devoid of qualities, · But-an objection is raised-even the passage 'The True,
knowledge, infinite is Brahman' intimates certain qualities of Brahman, viz. true being, knowledge, infinity -Not so, we reply. From the circumstance that all the terms of the sentence stand in co-ordination, it follows that they convey the idea of one matter (sense) only. If against this you urge that the sentence may convey the idea of one matter only, even if directly expressing a thing distinguished by several qualities; we must remark that you display an ignorance of the meaning of language which appears to point to some weakmindedness on your part. A sentence conveys the idea of one matter (sense) only when all its constitutive words denote one and the same thing; if, on the other band, it expresses a thing possessing several attributes, the difference of these attributes necessarily leads to a difference in meaning on the part of the individual words, and then the oneness of meaning of the sentence is lost.But from your view of the passage it would follow that the several words are mere synonyms -Give us your attention, we reply, and learn that several words may convey one meaning without being idle synonyms. From the determination of the unity of purport of the whole sentence 2 we conclude that the several words, applied to one thing, aim at expressing what is opposite in nature to whatever is contrary to the meanings of the several words, and that thus they have meaning and unity of meaning and yet are not mere synonyms. The details
· The texts which deny all qualities of Brahman are later in order than the texts which refer to Brahman as qualified, because denial presupposes that which is to be denied.
The unity of purport of the sentence is inferred from its constituent words having the same case-ending.
Digitized by
Digitized by Google