________________
186
VEDÂNTA-SOTRAS.
that knowledge on which meditation is based is produced by one set of texts, while that knowledge which puts an end to the world is produced by such texts as 'thou art that,' and the like. For, we ask, has the former knowledge the same object as the latter, or a different one? On the former alternative we are led to the same vicious reciprocal dependence which we noted above; and on the latter alternative it cannot be shown that meditation gives rise to eagerness with regard to the latter kind of knowledge. Moreover, as meditation presupposes plurality comprising an object of meditation, a meditating subject and so on, it really cannot in any perceptible way be helpful towards the origination of the comprehension of the sense of texts, the object of which is the oneness of a Brahman free from all plurality: he, therefore, who maintains that Nescience comes to an end through the mere comprehension of the meaning of texts really implies that the injunctions of hearing, reflection, and meditation are purposeless.
The conclusion that, since direct knowledge cannot spring from texts, Nescience is not terminated by the comprehension of the meaning of texts, disposes at the same time of the hypothesis of the so-called 'Release in this life' (gîvanmukti). For what definition, we ask, can be given of this Release in this life'?—Release of a soul while yet joined to a body'!-- You might as well say, we reply, that your mother never had any children! You have yourself proved by scriptural passages that 'bondage' means the being joined to a body, and 'release' being free from a body.Let us then define givanmukti as the cessation of embodiedness, in that sense that a person, while the appearance of embodiedness persists, is conscious of the unreality of that appearance. But, we rejoin, if the consciousness of the unreality of the body puts an end to embodiedness, how can you say that givanmukti means release of a soul while joined to a body? On this explanation there remains no difference whatsoever between Release in this life' and Release after death; for the latter also can only be defined as cessation of the false appearance of embodiedness.- Let us then say that a person is givanmukta 'when the appear
Digitized by
Digized by Google