Book Title: Satapatha Bramhana Part 05
Author(s): Julius Eggeling
Publisher: Oxford

Previous | Next

Page 1849
________________ III ADHYAYA, 3 PÂDA, 19. 641 with water. The doubt here arises whether what the texts mean to enjoin is the rinsing of the mouth, or a meditation on prâna as having water for its dress.— The Parvapakshin maintains the former view ; for, he says, the Vågasaneyaka uses the injunctive form he is to rinse,' while there is no injunctive form referring to the meditation ; and what the text says in praise of the breath thus not being allowed to remain naked may be taken as a mere glorification of the act of rinsing. And as ordinary rinsing of the mouth, subsequent to eating, is already established by Smriti and custom, we must conclude that the text means to enjoin. rinsing of the mouth of a different kind, viz. as auxiliary to the meditation on prâna.-To this the Satra replies that what the text enjoins is the new' thing, i.e. the previously non-established meditation on water as forming the dress of präna. On account of the statement of what has to be done,' i.e. on account of the statement of what is not established for only on the latter condition Scripture has a meaning. The beginning as well as the end of the Vågasaneyaka-text clearly refers to a meditation on the water used for rinsing as forming a dress for präna; and as rinsing is already established by Smriti and custom, we naturally infer that what the text enjoins is a meditation on breath as having the water used in rinsing for its dress. This also explains why the Khåndogya-text does not mention the rinsing at all, but merely the clothing of breath with water.—Here terminates the adhikarana of the statement of what has to be done.' 19. And (the qualities) thus being equal, on account of non-difference. In the book of the Vågasaneyaka, called Agnirahasya, we meet with a meditation on Brahman called Sandilyavidyâ; and there is also a Sandilya-vidya in the Brihadaranyaka. The Porvapakshin holds that these two meditations are different since the latter text mentions qualities-such as Brahman being the lord of all-which are not mentioned in the former; the objects of meditation thus being different, the meditations themselves are different. [48] Tt Digitized by Digitized by Google

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017