Book Title: Leshya kosha Part 2
Author(s): Mohanlal Banthia, Shreechand Choradiya
Publisher: Jain Darshan Prakashan

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 19
________________ ( 17 ) Three alternative theories have been proposed by commentators to explain the nature of lesya. In the first theory, it is regarded as a product of passions (kasaya-nisyanda), and consequently as arising on account of the rise of the kasaya-mohaniya karman. In the second, it is considered as the transformation due to activity (yogaparinama), and as such originating from the rise of karmans which produce three kinds of activity (physical, vocal and mental). In the third alternative, the lesya is conceived as a product of the eight categories of karman (jnanavaraniya, etc.), and as such accounted as arising on account of the rise of the eight categories of karman. In all these theories, the lesya is accepted as a state of the soul, accompanying the realization (audayika-bhava) of the effect of karman.11 Of these theories, the second theory appears plausible. The lesya, in this theory, is a transformation (parinati) of the sariranamakarman (body-making karman),12 effected by the activity of the soul through its various gross and subtle bodies-the physical organism (kaya), speech-organ (vak, or the mind organ (manas) functioning as the instrument of such activity. 13 The material aggregates involved in the activity constitute the lesya. The material particles attracted and transformed into various karmic categories (jnanavaraniya, etc.) do not make up the lesya. There is presence of lesya even in the absence of the categories of ghati-karman in the sayogi-kevalin stage of spiritual development, which proves that such categories do not constitute lesya, Similarly, the categories of aghati-karman also do not form the lesya as there is absence of lesya even in the presence of such categories in the ayogi-kevalin stage of spiritual development.14 The lesya-matter involved in the aciivity aggravates the kasayas if they are there.15 It is also responsible for the anubhaga (intensity) of karmic bondage.16 11. For the refutation of the theory propounding lesya as karmanisyanda, vide pp. 11-2. 12. P. 10 (line 10). 13. P. 10 (lines 13-21). 14. P. 11 (lines 3-8). 15. P. 11 (lines 8-9). 16. P. 11 (lines 15-7); also the Tika on Karmagrantha, IV, 1. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 ... 740