Book Title: Shadavashyaka Banav Bodh Vrutti
Author(s): Prabodh Bechardas Pandit
Publisher: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 62
________________ HISTORICAL PHONOLOGY 25 Loss of intervocalic stops in classical Prakrit creates new vowel sequences, many of which are contracted to unit vowels in the New Indo Aryan languages. This change plays a significant role in the development of the NIA languages. This also makes possible, for the MIA dialects, to borrow words from Sanskrit with the diphthongs ai and au, for which the grammarians have made a separate class (viz. daityādi gana ) of words which retain OIA diphthongs. Skt. diphthongs ai and au which became monophthongs in Pkt., as e and o, are retained in Modern Guj., while those which were borrowed later, and those which were formed in Pkt. by loss of intervening consonants develop to E and 5 in certain positions in modern Gujarati. 5:49. In the later MIA (mainly Apabhramsa ) the dependence of vowel quantity on the syllable and the word becomes more manifest. All word-final long vowels are shortened, and final -e and -o change to -i and -u respectively. In some of the early documents of MIA also, this tendency is manifest though it is worked out fully in later MIA. Shortening of some final vowels is already noticeable in Asokan Inscriptions and Pali (e. g. - a> -a, -ī>-i). In Dutreuil de Rhins documents there are instances of final-e of loc. sg. > -i, and -o of nom. sg. > -u. Moreover, the distinction of active and middle in Sanskrit is mainly dependent on distinction between-e and -i, i.e. act. 3rd sg. -ati, 3rd pl. -anti; mid. 3rd sg. -ate, 3rd pl. -ante; only the active survives in MIA which may suggest an earlier merger of -e with-i. 5.50. Development of final vowels with nasalisation is the same as that of simple vowels, i. e. they lose their nasalisation and are shortened. There is one exception. In the case of final -am m = the anusvāra ) there are two developments: either the nasal is lost or -an develops to -u; the second being more predominent in late MIA. This isogloss divides Midland languages from the Western languages. Gujarati falls within the Western group, (i. e. -am > -u in old Gujarati.) 5.51. In OIA, the quantity of vowel is distinctive in all positions. Moreover, the morphophonemic alternations of guņavrddhi present a significant relationship between i:e: ai, u: o: au and a:ā; these relationships are lost in MIA (just as the change of IIr. *ai and *au to OIA e and o, IIr. *ai and *āu to OIA ai and au considerably blurred the morphophonemic relationships between the vowels in OIA). MIA vowel system consisting of a set of short vowels and a set of long vowels3 ri u, i ն յ a ā , therefore, is a significantly different vowel system, where the quantity of e od the vowel is mainly dependent on the structure of the syllable and the word. 5.52. The oldest Gujarati documents (i.e. dated mss. of 13th-14th century ) presuppose certain developments after the MIA vowel system described above. To explain these changes we have to assume a stage, in which the vowel clusters of MIA (Continued from page 91) If MIA consonant system is reinte preted by the reconstruction of NTA languages, it may be possible to refine the above interpretation. Then, possibly, intervocalic [1]. (d) m y be assigned to different phonemes 11/, /fl, while intervoca lic geminates [11], (ad ) may be considered alloph nes of /l/ and / d l. Initial [n) and intervocalic (nn) and ] ņn) may be assigned to the same plaoneme/nl. Similar reinterpretation may be possible about m and s also, so that intervooalic -m -n-, --, -1- and -s- would be assigned respectively to/vl, in/.//./1/./h/ while initial m, n, d, 1 and s, or intervocalic geminates mm. on or nn, dd, ll and se would be assigned to / ml./n/, /d/, /1/ and / s). This interpretation is only very te:tative and could only be profitably discussed if various stages of the split of Indo-Aryan dialects are specified. 2. Jules Bloch. L'Indo-Aryen du Veda aux temps moderne' pp. 41. (1934). 3. For assigning MIA e ot the set of long vowels see Ghatage A. M. Paonetics and Phonemics in Linguistics' Indian Linguistics, Turner Jubilee Vol, pp. 182. (1958). Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372