Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 28
Author(s): Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

Previous | Next

Page 100
________________ No. 9] MADANPUR PLATE OF SRICH ANDRA ; YEAR 44 good his escape, after having descended from his elephant when the Choļa king, Rājēndra Choladēva I', invaded Bengal in about 1023 A.D., probably belonged to Srichandra's family and was a successor to that king. It may profitably be mentioned here that we have reference to the 12th and 23rd years of the reign of Govindachandra on the pedestal inscriptions of the Kulkudi (Faridpur) Sun-god and the Betka (Dacca) Väsudēva images respectively. It may be remarked in passing as to how in those early days prevailed in all parts of India the spirit of religious toleration amongst the people. Here in this copper-plate grant we find Srichandra, a Buddhist king, making a gift of land to a Vēdic Brāhmaṇa in the name of his own worshipped god, Buddha-bhattaraka. The first historical instance of advocacy for religious toleration can be traced to the famous edict (Rock Edict XII) of the Maurya Buddhist Emperor, Asoka. It has been stated above that the land donated by Srichandra was situated at a place in Yolāmandala. The name of this mandala occurs also in the hitherto unpublished Dhulla plate of the same king. Some of the localities, mentioned in the latter plate as situated in the same mandala, have been identified by Dr. N. K. Bhattasali with some places to the north of the river Dhaleswari in the Manikganj sub-division of the Dacca District, which is not far away from Sabhar and the find-place of our plate. So it seems quite likely that Yölämandala was once situated in that same area of the modern Dacoa District. The gift of the land of our plate was made by Srichandra on the Agasti-tritiya day (line 28). Most probably this tritiyā belongs to the dark fortnight of the month of Bhadra. It is believed that with the rise of Agasti or Agastya (Canopus) the waters of rivers, etc., begin to become clear and it also ushers in the barat (autumn) season. In Bengal offerings are made to Agastya in Bhadra. So it may be that the king made the gift of land to Sukradēva in Bhadra and that the charter was formally issued on the 28th of Märgaśīrsha (Agrahāyaṇa) in the 44th regnal year of the king. It now remains for me to make an attempt to explain the following new names of officials occurring in the list of functionaries addressed by the king while making his land-grant : Mahitantradhyaksha (1. 23), Gochohhakapati (11. 23-24) Arddha-nauväţaka (1. 24) and Nauva tala (1. 24). The term Mahātanträdhyaksha undoubtedly refers to the highest priest in charge of the religious rites which are performed on the king's behalf in accordance with the injunctions of the Srutis and the Smritis. The Ramganj copper-plate' of Isvaraghosha has a similar officer named as Mahatantrādhikrita. These two terms can easily be explained with the help of the definition of a Täntrika as we find in the Sukranitisāra. As for the term Gochchhakapati, it is difficult to explain it unless we imagine it to represent under Prākṣit influence the Sanskrit word Goshthakapati, the administrative head in charge of the pasture-land and cowsheds'. His functions may aptly be compared with those of the Vivitādhyaksha of Kautilya's Arthasāstra. The word nauvataka is very important. It is for the first time that we find this term used in a Bengal copper-plate along with the names of officials addressed by the donor king in land-grant documents. It occurs in another context (the description of Pataliputra situated on the Ganges) in the Khalimpur plate of Dharmapāla. The word was there interpreted by Kielhorn as a fleet of boats' and he equated it with nauvitāna used in Vijayasēna's Deopara inscription. We may in this connection also 1 Above, Vol. IX, pp. 232-233. Above, Vol. XXVII, pp. 24 ff. • Inscriptions of Bengal, Vol. III, p. 153. • C£. V, 185 in Chapter II (Śruti-emrit-itarair-mantr-anushthinairdēvar-archchanum kartinn hit siamo mated yalatt a cha Tantrikab). . Cf. Chapter 34, Book II. . Above, Vol. IV, pp. 249 and 252, n. 5. Toid., Vol. 1, p. 309.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526