Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 28
Author(s): Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 218
________________ No. 26] THREE INSCRIPTIONS FROM VALGUDAR 143 for a long time. It therefore seems that Govindapāla succeeded Madanapāla on'y over some districts of South Bihar, though even there the later Pālas were struggling for their existence with the Gā hadavālas of the U. P. The Maner plates' of 1124 A. C. show that the Gahadavālas had already advanced as far as the Patna District where the Gahadavāla king Govindachandra (circa 1114-55 A. C.) granted in that year a piece of land not far from Patna. The Lar plates? of 1146 A. C. show that the same Gāhadavāla king was during that year staying at Mudgagiri or Monghyr. These records suggest that the later Pālas, who were Buddhists, were ousted from the Patna and Monghyr Districts by the Brahmanical Gāhadavālas. But the Valgüdar inscription of 1161 A. C., referring to the Krimilā vishaya, situated between Patna and Monghyr, as a part of Madanapāla's dominions, no doubt points to the success of this king against the Gāhadavāla rulers'. Whether, however, Madanapāla's successor Govinda pāla was ruling only over the Gaya District and the adjoining area or whether his dominions also included the whole of the Patna and Mongbyr Districts cannot be determined in the present state of our knowledge. The Bodhgayā inscription of Gābadavāla Jayachchandra (circa 1170-93 A. C.), however, shows that it was the Gāhadavālas who overthrew the Pālas even from the Gaya District. The date of the Bodhgayā inscription falls between Vikrama Sarvat 1240 (1183-84 A. C.) and 1249 (1192-93 A. C.), but probably towards the earlier part of this period. The Sihvar platego bearing an earlier date (1175 A. C.) appear to refer to a grant of land made by king Jayachchandra in the Patna District. As already noticed above, the Pālas dated their charters according to their regnal reckoning. This is also the case with the private records of their time. The use of the Vikrama Samvat in the Gayā inscription of Govindapāla, which is not an official record of the king, may be explained by the fact that this era, which was quite popular in the U. P.,' may have infiltrated itself in South Bihar especially when the Gáhadavālas succeeded Govindapāla. The Gáhadavāla inscriptions, discovered in Bihar, are dated in the Vikrama Sarvat and the Gayā inscription referring to Govindapāla's lost sovereignty belongs apparently to this period of Gähadavāla occupation of South Bihar. Of course, the Buddhists of Banaras may also have been partially responsible for carrying the use of the Vikrama era to the Buddhist sites of Bihar. But even if thus the use of the era of Vikrama in Govindapāla's Gayā inscription can be rather easily explained, it seems difficult to explain the dating of the Valgüdar inscription of Madanapāla in the Saka era. This era was adopted by the imperial Gangas of Orissa about the end of the tenth century probably from their southern neighbours, the Eastern Chālukyas of the Andhra country. With the expansion of the Ganga power about the beginning of the twelfth century towards the north-east up to the Bhagirathi or the present Hooghly river, the use of the Saka era must have been known in the south-western fringe of Bengal. But the popularity of this era in Bengal seems to have been actually due to the establishment of the power of the Sēnas who hailed from a country where the era was popular. The fact that the Sēnas followed their predecessors, the Palas, in dating their 1 See I. H.Q., Vol. VII, pp. 519 ff. J.A..B., Vol. XVIII, p. 81. 3 Above, Vol. VII, p. 98. 4 There is another image inscription, dated in the 3rd year of Madanapala's reign, corresponding to 1146-47 A. C., which was found at Bihar in the Patna District. The Jaynagar image inscription, referred to above, is dated in his 14th regnal year, corresponding to 1157-58 A.C. The village of Jaynagar is known to be near Luckoesarai (in the Monghyr District), but is placed in the Gaya District, (sce Cunningham, A.S.R., Vol. III, p. 25) apparently through mistake. 6 Bhandarkar, List, No. 401. • Ind. Ant., Vol. XVIII, p. 129; Ray, op. cit., pp. 537-38. * The popularity of the Vikrama Sarvat in the U. P. was due especially to the Gurjara-Prathara emperors, Although it was used in an earlier age by the Maukharis and the Malayakitus (Bhandarkar, List, Nos. 10, 34). The dating of the Sarnath inscription of the time of Mahipala I was due to this local influence.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526