Book Title: Dravya Sangraha Author(s): Nemichandra Siddhant Chakravarti, Saratchandra Ghoshal Publisher: ZZZ UnknownPage 63
________________ DRAVYA-SAMGRAHA, 2. and an agent, has the same extent as its own body, is the enjoyer (of the fruits of Karma), exists in samsâra, is Siddha and has a characteristic upward motion COMMENTARY. In this verse the author lays down the distinguishing characteristics of Jiva. The nine characteristics of Jiva mentioned in this verse will be taken up one by one in verses 4-14, and a full explanation of them will be given in the notes to the said verses. Brahmadeva in his Commentary on Dravya-Samgraha has mentioned in connection with this verse that each of these characteristics of Jiva is mentioned in order to differentiate the Jaina conception of Jiva' from that of Sankhya, Nyâya, Mîmâmsâ, Charvaka, Sadasiva and Bauddha systems of philosophy. His words are as follows: "frafare: Flatsgfa, slagsgia u de afa, ha जीवस्थापन भट्टचार्वाकद्वयं प्रति, कर्मकर्तृत्वस्थापनं सांख्य प्रति, स्वदेहप्रमिति-स्थापन नैयायिक-मीमांसक-सांख्य-त्रय प्रति, कर्मभक्तित्व-व्याख्यान बौद्ध प्रति, संसारस्थ-व्याख्यानं सदाशिवं प्रति, सिद्धत्व-व्याख्यान भट्ट-चार्वाकद्वय प्रति, ऊद ध्वगति-स्वभावकथनं माण्डलिक-ग्रन्थकारं प्रति इति मतार्थो ज्ञातव्यः।" i.e., Jiva is established to (refute) Charvaka, its characteristic of having upayoga consisting of Jñana and Darsan is said to (refute the followers of Nyâya, that of Jiva being formless to (refute) Blatta (i.e., those who follow Kumârila Bhatta, the propounder of one branch of Mimâmsâ philosophy) and Chârvaka, that of the agency of Karma to (refute the) Sankhya (view), that of having the same extent of its body is expressed to refute the three, viz., the Nyâya, Mimâmsâ and Sânklıya views, that of the enjoyment of (the fruits of) Karma is said to refute the Buddhistic view, that of being in the Samsara to refute Sadasiva, that of being Siddha to refute Bhatta and Charvaka, and that of having an upward motion to refute views of all other writers." It should be remembered that, as the Hindu and the Buddhist philosophers omitted no opportunity to refute the views of the Jaina philosophy, so also the Jain philosophers on their part tried to refute the views of their opponents. It is a special feature of nearly every system of Indian philosophy to proceed to maintain its own views after refuting those of other systems. Examples of such refutation by Hindu philosophers may be found in Vedanta Sûtra, Chapter II, Padas I and II, and Sankhya Satra, Chapter V. The refutation of the views of the Hindu systems of philosophy may, on the otherPage Navigation
1 ... 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324