________________
" THE REVEALED WORD."
1021
It has been found, etc. etc.'-Found' in scriptures and also in common experience; e.g. when the enveloping darkness is removed, the Jar that is there,-even though its perception may not be desired, -becomes perceived, because it lies in a perceptible spot.-(2166)
[The following might be urged)—It has been asserted (in Text 2157). that if Sound were embellished, it would be heard by all '; but this incon. gruity does not arise, because even a single Sound may be embellished for ono man, while not-embellished for another ; just as the same woman, through difference in relationship, may be mother to one and daughter to another person.
The answer to this is as follows:
TEXT (2167). THE WORD-SOUND BEING ONE, IT CANNOT BE REGARDED AS BOTH embellished AND not embellished; SO THAT ONLY ONE CONDITION SHOULD BE ADMITTED, NO MATTER WHETHER IT BE
COGNISED, OR NOT COGNISED, BY ALL.-(2167)
COMMENTARY.
The Sound being one, the two conditions of being embellished' and not embellished' cannot belong to it, at the same time; because the condition cannot differ from the conditioned ; so that, as the conditioned Sound' is one only, its condition (embellished or otherwise) must be one only.--As regards the case of one and the same woman being both Mother and Daughter,
- there it is the name only that differs, not the thing itself; while in the case in question, the difference is not merely in name, as the sound is there as equally perceptible by all men ; whence there could not be perception and non-perception at the same time, and mere change in name cannot deprive a thing of its innate capacity for effective action.
It might be said that the nature of Sound is such that it is perceptible by certain restricted persons only, so that there would be nothing incon. gruous in its perception and non-perception at the same time, by reason of the capacity of the particular persons concerned.
This cannot be so; if it were so, then if Sound is not perceived by a man at one time, it would never be perceived by him but such is not the case.
Hence, in order to preserve the one-ness of the Sound, only one condi. tion should be accepted-either the embellished or the unembellished.
Question :- What would be the result of this ? Answer: So that only one condition, etc. etc.'-(2167)
RENDS
The following Text puts forward the objection against the view that there is embellishment of both, Sound and Sense-organ' (the third alternative view set forth under Text 2157)