Book Title: Tattva Sangraha Vol 2
Author(s): Kamlashila, Ganganatha Jha
Publisher: Oriental Research Institute Vadodra

Previous | Next

Page 702
________________ EXAMINATION OF THE PERSON OF SUPER-NORMAL VISTON'. 1427 tion of a similar thing; for example, there is remembrance of the Cow through the perception of the Gavaya ;-it is not possible for any one to perceive at the present time any person similar to the Omniscient Person - hence, on account of the similar thing not being perceptible, Analogy cannot be operative in the case in question. This argument may be formulated as follows:-When any object similar to an object is not perceptible, the latter cannot be amenable to Analogy,e.g. the Son of the Barren Woman -any person similar to the Omniscient Person is not perceptible ;-0 there is non-apprehension of the wider character.-(3215) Further, it is not only that the knowledge of the Omniscient Person cannot be derived from Analogy ; on the contrary, it would be right for all men to deduce, from Analogy, the fact that there can be no Omniscient Person. This is what is shown in the following TEXT (3216). "FINDING THAT ALL MEN OF THE PRESENT TIME ARE not OMNISCIENT, THE CERTAINTY IS DERIVED FROM ANALOGY BASED UPON THIS SIMILARITY, THAT ALL OTHER MEN (OF THE PAST AND THE YUTURE) COULD NOT BE OMNISCIENT."—(3216) COMMENTARY. In order to show that the Omniscient Person cannot be known through Presumption, the Vaidika puts forward the view of the other party : TEXTS (3217-3218). "SOME ONE MAY ACCEPT THE OMNISCIENT PERSON ON THE FOLLOWING GROUNDS : (A) THE TEACHINGS OF BUDDHA RELATING TO Dharma and Adharma CANNOT BE EXPLAINED, IF THERE BE NO OMNISCIENT PERSON;TIUS YROM Presumption, ONE CAN ADMIT THE OMNISCIENT PERSON,-EVEN THOUGH IT HAS BEEN SHOWN THAT PERCEPTION AND THE OTHER MEANS OF COGNITION ARE NOT CAPABLE OF AFFORDING THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE SAID Person?"-3217-3218) COMMENTARY. The teachings of Buddha and others that are met with cannot be explained, except on the presumption of His omniscience ;-i.e. if Dharma and all such things were not known to Him. Hence, even though Perception, etc. have been denied, as vouching for the existence of the Omniscient Person,

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887