Book Title: Tattva Sangraha Vol 2
Author(s): Kamlashila, Ganganatha Jha
Publisher: Oriental Research Institute Vadodra

Previous | Next

Page 711
________________ 1436 TATTVASANGRAHA: CHAPTER XXVI. TEXTS (3244-3246). " TEACHINGS ISSUING FROM THE WALLS COULD NOT BE ACCEPTED AS TAUGHT BY A RELIABLE PERSON. IN FACT, THERE WOULD BE NO CONFIDENCE IN THEM,--IT BEING DOUBTFUL BY WHOM THEY HAVE BEEN PROPOUNDED-HAVE THEY BEEN PROPOUNDED BY Buddha, OR BY DECEITFUL Brahmanas, PUT FORWARD IN JOKE, BY MEANS OF WORDS BEARING THE SEMBLANCE OF THE WORDS (OF BUDDHA), -OR BY PETTY UNSEEN ELEMENTALS AND OTHERS.For THESE REASONS, PEOPLE WHO REGARD THEMSELVES AS WISE SHOULD PLACE NO CONFIDENCE IN SUCH TEACHINGS."-3244-3246) COMMENTARY. All this is easily comprehensible.--(3244-3246) So far the Author has set forth arguments, from Kumärila's point of view, against the Buddhist view that there are Omniscient Persons. He now sets forth arguments adduced by the two writers, Sāmata and Yajñata, against the idea of the Omniscient Person: TEXTS (3247-3261) "THUS THEN, THERE IS NO ROOM FOR THE OMNISCIENCE OF MEN. WE NOW PROCEED TO CONSIDER WHY THE OMNISCIENT PERSON HAS BEEN POSTULATED—YOUR OMNISCIENT PERSON-DOES HE APPREHEND ALL THINGS BY A SINGLE COGNITION? OR BY SEVERAL COGNITIONS ? AND THEN, DOES HE APPREHEND THEM ALL AT ONCE ? OR IN SUOCESSION-NOTICING ONLY THE MORE IMPORTANT THINGS? IN NO CASE HAS IT BEEN SEEN THAT A SINGLE COGNITION APPREHENDS SUCH CONTRADICTORY THINGS As pure and impure AND SO TORTH; NOR HAVE SEVERAL DIVERGENT COGNITIONS BEEN TOUND TO APPEAR AT ONE AND THE SAME TIME. WHO TOO IS THERE WHO COULD APPREHEND, EVEN IN HUNDREDS OF YEARS, EACH OF THE ENDLESS NUMBER OF THINGS, PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE ?-EVEN IF THE PERSON, BY. HIS OWN UNDIVERSIFIED NATURE, APPREHENDS ALL THINGS, HE CANNOT APPREHEND THE SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALITIES OF ALL THINGS. UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES, WHAT WOULD BE THE USE OF THE OMNISCIENT PERSON WHO KNOWS THE THINGS ONLY IN THEIR GENERAL FORM? SPECIALLY AS IN NO OTHER FORM TS THE THING APPREHENDED. THEN AGAIN, THIS UNIFORM COGNITION COULD BE EITHER TRUE OR FALSE.-IF IT BE HELD TO BE true, THEN THIS WOULD BE CONTRARY TO PERCEIVED PACTS; AS IT WOULD MEAN THAT ALL IS one, WITHOUT A SECOND; AND THE RESULT OF THIS

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887