Book Title: Tattva Sangraha Vol 2
Author(s): Kamlashila, Ganganatha Jha
Publisher: Oriental Research Institute Vadodra

Previous | Next

Page 772
________________ EXAMINATION OF THE PERSON OF SUPER-NORMAL VISION'. 1497 TEXTS (3374–3377). WHEN REASONS SUCH AS BEING KNOWN, BEING AN ENTITY', 'BEING' AND SO FORTH ARE INCAPABLE OF SETTING ASIDE THE OMNISCIENT PERSON, -WHO IS THERE WHO WILL NOT ADMIT HIS EXISTENCE ? -THUS NO REASON, EITHER TEMPORAL OR SCRIPTURAL, THAT THE UPHOLDER OF THE VEDA CAN HAVE IN HIS MOUTH, IS CAPABLE OF REMOVING THE POISON OF THE AWFUL SERPENT IN THE SHAPE OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE Shakya.--IN FACT, THE FEEBLE AND DULL-WITTED BRAHMANA, EVEN WHEN MERELY GLANCED AT BY THE POISON FROM THE EYES (OF THAT SERPENT), BECOMES UNABLE EVEN TO BREATHE, --WHAT TO SAY OF SETTING IT ASIDE ! ANY REASONING, EVEN WHEN SOUND, BECOMES UGLY IN THE MOUTH OF THE VEDIC SCHOLAR, -ON ACCOUNT OF ITS ABUNDANCE IN A LOWLY SUBSTRATUM ; JUST LIKE THE STRING OF BEADS PLACED AT THE FEET.—(3374–3377) COMMENTARY. • Who will not admit His existence ?'-i.e. as a possibility. That is to say, when the mere absence of proofs to the contrary establishes that possibility. This matter may rest here. There is no wonder that the unsound reasoning appearing in the mouth of the Vedic Scholar does not shine ; what is strange, however, is that even a sound reason when asserted by you, fails to shine, on account of the defective character of its substratum.-(3374-3377) How so?' Question Answer: TEXTS (3378-3379). HE CANNOT ASSERT EVEN THE INFALLIBILITY OF THE CONCOMITANCE BETWEEN Smoke and Fire ; BECAUSE, UNDER HIS VIEW, Smoke EXISTS ELSEWHERE ALSO ; IN FACT, BEING OF THE ONE UNIFORM NATURE OF 'ENTITY', IT EXISTS IN THE OCEAN ALSO ; AND IF FIRE EXISTS THERE ALSO, THEN WHERE WOULD THE absence (OF THE PROBANS) LIE --(3378-3379) COMMENTARY. That the birth of Smoke is related to Fire, and that it is invariably concomitant with Fire is known even to the veriest cowherd ; and yet you, by describing the whole world as really one and uniform in the shape of "Entity', are unable to say that Smoke is infallible in its concomitance with Fire; because under your view, in the form of 'Entity', it is present in water also. "Even so there would be concomitance with Fire."

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887