________________
EXAMINATION OF THE 'PERSON OF SUPER-NORMAL VISION'.
1577
As regards the Universal postulated by other people, in the form perpetual contiguity,—that also has been shown, under the chapter on the Universal', as being entirely feature-lens, characterless. So that is the Apprehension envisages this Universal it becomes all the more clearly 'beset with Conceptual Oontent and Error'.-(3637)
It has been argued under Tert 3256, that--"If the Omniscient Person is held to be that Person who knows all things and their causes, through a single abnormal Cognition,-then there can be no Means of Cognition to vouch for His existence, etc. etc.".
The answer to this is as follows:
TEXTS (3638-3639).
THAT PERSON IS CERTAINLY CALLED 'OMNISCIENT' WHO KNOWS ALL THINGS ALONG WITH THEIR CAUSES, THROUGH A SINGLE ABNORMAL COGNITION BROUGHT ABOUT BY COMMUNION. THE EXISTENCE OF SUCH A PERSON HAS BEEN ALREADY ESTABLISHED BEFORE, BY MEANS OF INFERENCE. THUS THERE IS A DISTINCT MEANS OF COGNITION VOUCHING FOR Hrs ExISTENCE. HENCE IT FOLLOWS THAT SUCH A
ONE REALLY EXISTS.-(3638-3639)
COMMENTARY
It has been argued under Text 3258,-- "Whether simultaneously or suc cessively, how could there be any Inference, without an effect ? etc. etc.".
The answer to this is as follows:
TEXT (3640).
SIMUI/TANEOUSLY OR SUCCESSIVELY, THERE IS COGNITION TOLLOWING FROM THE EFFEOT THAT IS MANIFESTED. WHEN HE IMPARTS THE TEACHING, HE HAS THE REQUISITE CAPACITY
ALSO,(3640)
OOMMENTARY.
This is easily understood.-(3640)
It has been argued under Text 3260, that, "The idea that there is one Person who has acquired special powers not common among men and He knows all things,- is entirely baseless".
The answer to this is as follows:
