________________
1488
TATTVASANGRAHA: CHAPTER XXVI.
support of the Omniscience of Jina, are also urged by the Jainas against the other party, etc. etc.".
The answer to this is as follows:
TEXT (3351).
THUS, THOSE OBJECTIONS THAT THE BUDDHISTS, WITHOUT ANGER, URGE AGAINST THE ASSERTION OF THE OMNISCIENCE OF Jina,-THE Jainas ARE NOT IN A POSITION TO URGE (AGAINST
THE BUDDHIST).—(3351)
COMMENTARY
"Without anger'-Free from anger. In fact the Buddhists proceed to put forward those arguments only through pity for you, not, through anger or arrogance, like yourselves.
This-Because it has been shown that the Syūdvūda and other teachings propounded by him are defective. (3351)
It has been argued under Text 3153,-"How can any definite conclusion be arrived at through such reasonings and counter-reasonings, which are uncertain and swallowed by their own reflections ?"
The answer to this is as follows:
TEXTS (3352-3353).
BECAUSE TRE TRUTH THAT HAS BEEN FOUND IN THE BUDDHIST DOCTRINE, THROUGX PROOFS WITH WELL-ESTABLISHED PREMISES, HAS NOT BEEN SO YOUND IN ANY OTHER DOCTRINE, THEREFORE PLEASE DRAW AS MANY DEFINITE CONCLUSIONS AS YOU CAN, THROUGH VARIOUS REASONINGS AND COUNTER-REASONINGS, WHICH ARE WELL-POUNDED AND NOT SWALLOWED BY THEIR OWN REYLECTIONS,
(3352-3353)
COMMENTARY.
Yat-Because.
Siddhapratibandhëna '-By means of Premises asserting identity and the cousal relations, on the strength of the real state of things.
Tana' –Therefore.-(3352-3353)
It has been argued, under Text 3157,-“Who can reasonably accept the existence of a person who can be regarded by such reasons as being cognisable', oto. etc.”
The answer to this is as follows:
