Book Title: Tattva Sangraha Vol 2
Author(s): Kamlashila, Ganganatha Jha
Publisher: Oriental Research Institute Vadodra

Previous | Next

Page 590
________________ EXAMINATION OF THE DOCTRINE OF SELF-SUFFICIENT VALIDITY'. 1315 Question :-"What is the reason for this ? " Answer - The Cognition does not, etc. etc. '_' Tat Cognition.--(2923-2924) stands for the In the following Text, the Author anticipates and answers the rejoinder of the other party : TEXT (2925). IF THE COGNITION IS HELD TO BE NOT-MOMENTARY AND EVEN ETERNAL, THEN THIS GOES AGAINST WHAT HAS BEEN ACCEPTED ELSEWHERE, AND IT IS ALSO NULLIFIED BY REASONING. --(2925) COMMENTARY. In another context, Kumärila has declared the unity and eternality of Cognitions, as declared by him in the following words' For us, Cognitions being of the same nature as the Spirit (Soul), are held to be eternal and one" [Shlokavārtika-Eternality of Words, 404]. Under this view, the Proposition put forward (that Cognitions are eternal) would go against what has been accepted elsewhere, -as also against Inference. For instance, it has been held that Cognitions are momentary ; as said in the Bhāşya (Shabara)—“It is momentary and does not remain till the time of the appearance of another Cognition" (Sü. 1. 1. 5, page 9, line 17); and it also goes against the words of Kumarila himself, to the effect that“ Cognition does not continue to exist for a single moment” (ShloleavārtikaSense-perception 55).-(2925) The following Text points out how the assertion of the Eternality of Cognitions is nullified by reasoning : TEXT (2926). (a) IT HAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED IN DETAIL THAT ALL THINGS ARE IN PERPETUAL FLUX';(6) AS FOR THE ETERNAL THING, IT IS NEVER produced ; WHAT NEED THEN COULD IT HAVE OF A CAUSE ?-(2926) COMMENTARY. If Cognition is eternal, then it cannot be right to hold that it needs a Cause; this is pointed out in the words—' As regards the eternal thing, etc. etc. '-It is only what is produced that needs something else as its Cause ; what is eternal, however, can never be produced; what need can that have of it (2926) In the following Teat the author shows, through a formulated argument, that the idea of the Mimāmsaler is annulled by Inference

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887