Book Title: Tattva Sangraha Vol 2
Author(s): Kamlashila, Ganganatha Jha
Publisher: Oriental Research Institute Vadodra

Previous | Next

Page 634
________________ EXAMINATION OF THE DOCTRINE OF SELF-SUFFICIENT VALIDITY'. 1359 Kumarila has again argued as follows-" Thus ther, from excellences follows the absence of defects,--from this absence, follows the absence of the two forms of Invalid Cognition; consequently the general law remains undenied ", and so forth.-[Shlokavdrtika 1. 1. 2; 65). This also cannot be right, when there is no certainty regarding the absence of defects.This is what is pointed out in the following: - TEXTS (3048-3049). WHEN THERE IS NO COGNITION OF THE absence of defects, HOW COULD THERE BE ANY COGNITION OF THE absence of the two kinds of Invalid Cognition,-FROM WHICH THE CERTAINTY REGARDING VALIDITY COULD BE DEDUCED I-AND IF, EVEN WHEN THERE IS NO COGNITION OF THE ABSENCE OF THE TWO KINDS OF INVALID COGNITION, THE Self-Validity (OF THE COGNITION) WERE COGNISED, THEN, AS BEFORE, THERE WOULD BE NO DOUBT OR MISCONCEPTION AT ALL.-- (3048-3049) COMMENTARY. If there came about a Cognition free from the Doubt and Misconception, which are contrary' to that Cognition,-then that Cognition should be valid; otherwise, if the matter were beset with the contrary notions, how could the general law come in at all? Because the two contrary notions, Doubt and Misconception, are effects of defects; hence there can be no certainty regarding the absence of these contrary notions, unless there is certainty regarding the absence of defects. The absence of the two kinds of Invalid Cognition i.e. the absence of Doubt and Misconception.-(3048-3049) The following Text points out the contrary Cognition': TEXT (3050). [THE CONTRARY COGNITION BEING IN THE FORM)-(a) 'IS HIS ASSERTION TRUE OR UNTRUE?' (DOUBT), OR (6) IT IS ABSOLUTELY UNTRUE" (MISCONCEPTION); (THESE WOULD BE 'CONTRARY'] BECAUSE THERE IS THE CERTAINTY THAT ALL COGNITIONS ARE VALID BY THEMSELVES.-(3050) COMMENTARY. So far it has been explained that the absence of defects and other conditions do not, by their mere presence, help in the bringing about of the certainty regarding Validity; now the Author proceeds to explain in detail that if the certainty regarding the said Absence of Defects were essential,

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887