Book Title: Tattva Sangraha Vol 2
Author(s): Kamlashila, Ganganatha Jha
Publisher: Oriental Research Institute Vadodra

Previous | Next

Page 668
________________ EXAMINATION OF THE PERSON OF SUPER-NORMAL VISION'. 1393 Says tho Mimūmsaka's Opponent :-All that is cognisable is included under the five things, Colour (Taste, Odour, Touch and Speech); and men who know all these are well known; hence the Mimāmsaka's Proposition that there is no one who knows all things is contrary to ordinary experience". The Mimümsaka's answer to this is as follows: TEXT (3128). " ALL THAT IS PERTINENT TO THE PRESENT CONTEXT IS THE DENIAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF Dharma (BY MAN); WHO IS DENYING THE POSSIBILITY OF A PERSON KNOWING OTHER THINGS?" -(3128) COMMENTARY. "In the present context, which deals with the question of the Reliability of the Veda, all that is meant by us is the donial of the existence of any person who knows all things relating to Dharma, not the denial of the person knowing all things that are included under the denotation of the term 'all'. Thus if people apply the term omniscient' (all-knowing) to a certain person, in the sense that he knows all things except Dharma and Adharma,—we do not deny this; hence our Proposition does not run counter to ordinary experience".-(3128) "Further, if you Buddhists also urge, against us, the possibility of regarding, as 'all-knowing, the man who knows all things except Dharma and Adharma,—then that is entirely superfluous. This is what is pointed out in the following TEXT (3129). " IN EVERY CASE, THE TERM "ALL' IS USED IN REFERENCE TO THE CONTEXT ; HENCE IF THERE IS A PERSON KNOWING all things RELATING TO A CERTAIN CONTEXT, --WHAT HARM DOES THAT DO TO OUR POSITION ? "-(3129) COMMENTARY. Question What is that 'all' that relates to the present context ? Answer: TEXT (3130). “THERE ARE CERTAIN EFFECTS (SPOKEN OF) WHICH, IF FOUND IMPOSSIBLE IN RELATION TO THE OBJECT DENOTED BY THE WORD, ARE APPLIED TO THE WORD ITSELF ; HENCE THE MAN WHO KNOWS THE word ' ALL', MAY BE CALLED "all-KNOWING' IN NAME."-(3130) COMMENTARY. "For example, in Grammar, we find such assertions as agnērdrl' and so forth which lay own such effects as the addition of certain affixes ;

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887