Book Title: Tattva Sangraha Vol 2
Author(s): Kamlashila, Ganganatha Jha
Publisher: Oriental Research Institute Vadodra

Previous | Next

Page 568
________________ EXAMINATION OF THE DOCTAINE OF 'SELF-SUFFICIENT VALIDITY'. 1293 AT SOME STAGE OR THE OTHER, THE SELF-VALIDITY OF THE COGNITION, -IT IS FAR BETTER TO ADMIT IT AT THE VERY FIRST STEP." - (2858-2860) COMMENTARY. What is meant is that just as in the initial cognition, the validity is dependent upon the perfections apprehended by another cognition,-s0 should it be in other cognitions also. As before ' as in the case of certainty of validity arising from corroboration. One after the other'-in each preceding cognition of perfections. If, through fear of Infinite Regress, it be held that the validity of the cognition of perfection is inherent in it, self-sufficient, then what hostility should there be against the cognitions of the object itself,by virtue of which its validity is held to be extraneous, not inherent ? We do not perceive any reason for this. Thus then the flying bird, not perceiving the end of the other shore, has to return to the place whence it started; consequently, there is no need for the making of baseless assumptions. This is what is pointed out by the words— In case the cognition of the perfection, etc. etc. Dependent upon the perfection-i.e. that which has its validity dependent upon the certain cognition of the perfection.—(2858-2860) The following might be urged-There is a difference between the initial cognition on the one hand and the subsequent corroborative cognition, and the cognition of perfection on the other, on account of which difference, while the validity of these latter two is inherent, that of the former is not so. The answer to this is as follows: TEXTS (2861-2863). " ON WHAT GROUNDS HAVE THE CORROBORATIVE COGNITION AND THE COGNITION OF PERFECTION BEEN HELD TO BE SUPERIOR TO THE INITIAL COGNITION, ON THE STRENGTH OF WHICH THE LATTER SHOULD BE DEPENDENT UPON THOSE TWO ?-FROM ALL THIS IT FOLLOWS THAT VALIDITY MUST BE REGARDED AS INHERENT IN ALL COGNITIONS, AS A GENERAL RULE ; AND IT IS DISCARDED ONLY WHEN THERE IS EITHER AN ANNULMENT OF IT OR THE COGNITION OF ITS SOURCE BEING DEFECTIVE. EVEN THOUGH THIS WAY THE DISCARDING OF THE VALIDITY WILL BE DEPENDENT UPON EXTRANEOUS CAUSES, THERE WOULD BE NO INFINITE REGRESS. BECAUSE AFTER ALL, IT WOULD BE DEPENDENT UPON VALIDITY, AND THIS IS THERE, INHERENT IN THE COGNITION."-(2861-2863) COMMENTARY. Objection If Cognition is self-sufficient in Cognitions become valid, which is absurd. its validity, then all

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887