Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 30
Author(s): Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 45
________________ 22 EPIGRAPHIÀ INDICA (VOL. XXX religious establishments is not unknown in Indian epigraphy. Thus an inscription' in the Simbachalam temple in the Visakhapatnam District records a grant made in its favour by Tallamadēvi, queen of Ganga Bhānu IV, when she was herself staying at Vārāṇasi-kataka (Varanasikatakānundi) which is the same as Abhinava-Vārānasi of Somaladevi's record. The village of Udaiyakāmam or Udayakäma was no doubt situated in her own jägir in her husband's dominions. The mention of the Ganga king's regnal reckoning in dating Sömaladēvi's record appears to be due to the fact that it was drafted at the Ganga capital. The grant of Anangabhima III in favour of the Kāñchipuram temple was apparently made similarly in absentia. But the partiality shown by the Ganga queen and her husband to a Vaishnava shrine in the Tamil country may suggest that she was related to the Chōļa royal house. It will thus be seen from the above discussion that there is hardly any proof in favour of the suggestions that the Ganga king Anangabhima III was for a time stationed at Kāñchi together with his qneen Sõmaladevi and that he conquered the Tamil country as far as the Tanjore-Tiruchirappalli region in the south. . The inscription under discussion mentions two villages, viz., Tarallakshmi and Sāgarapatimă which were the subject of the grant made by Govinda, a general of the Ganga king Anangabhima III. The exact situation of the villages is not mentioned in the record and it is difficult to locate them. TEXT 1 Siddham? Svasti [*] Prõddhata-hētivāhi-dhvänta-dhansie-dyutijyamana-dainya-jala dhi(dhi)2 nimagna-di(di)n-ānātha-baran-aika-taraņēr-bhagavataḥ srimad-Anisya*]ákabhima 1811, Vol. VI, No. 1067. * There are other instances of similar grants. Mr. P. B. Desai draws my attention to No. 154 of 8I1, Vol.. XI (Part ii, pp. 1928.) which registers the gift of the village of Kanakāpura in Kundur 500 (Dharwar District) for burning incense in the temple of Somanāthadova of the Saurashtra vishaya (Kathiawar) by Mahamandalisvara Jayakēsidēva, at the time of his marriage, under the direction of his father-in-law and overlord Chalukya Vikramditya VI (1076-1126 A.C.). As pointed out to me by Mr. P. Acharya, the Antarudrs vishaya, in which the village granted by Sómaladēvi was situated, is mentioned in the Chaurasi plate of the Bhsuma-Kara king Sivakara II and has been identified with the modern Antarodha Pargana in the Sadar Subdivision of the Puri District of Orissa (Misra, Orissa under the Bhauma Kings, p. 8). • There are many inscriptions in temples like those at Simhachalam and Srikūrmam, which are big prasastis. These were apparently not composed on the spot but were carried by the donors with the intention of engraving them in the temples after having made the donations desired. It may be conjectured that Sómaladēvi was a sister or daughter of the Chola king Rajaraja III. But her name (exhibiting some Kannada influence) in that case may suggest that she was born of a Kannada princess. Even if it may be believed that Anangabhima III was actually present at Kanchipuram on the occasion of his own grant (No. 445 of 1919), it should better be explained in a different way. He might have visited the temple as a pilgrim. Such instances are not unknown in the inscriptions of South India. Mr. M. Venkataramayya draws my attention to SIT, Vol. IV, No. 428, and No. 29 of 1908. The first of these two records registers a gift of land made in favour of the god at Jambukēgvaram (Tiruchirappalli District) by JÄkhadēvi, queen of Rahula Jājaladēva, son of Bhimadeva of the Saubhapa (Chauhan) kula. The other inscription is a GAhadavala record of 1110-11 A.C.. which was found in the temple at Gangaikondacholapuram in the same district (ARSIE, 1908, Part II, p. 66). In the present state of our knowledge, it is impossible to believe that the Chauhans or the Gahadavālas invaded the Tamil country. The grants in question must have been made either in absentia or in the course of tours of pilgrimage. .. From impressions preserved in the office of the Government Epigraphist for India at Ootacamund. * Expressed by aymbol. . Read dhva msi-.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 ... 490