Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 30 Author(s): Hirananda Shastri Publisher: Archaeological Survey of IndiaPage 71
________________ EPIGRAPHIA INDICA [Vol. XXX eulogy is all about the Early Gangas, and the donor, Mahārāja Indravarman, is said to be the establisher of the spotless Ganga family, the years may be taken to be of the Ganga era till such time as the contrary is proyed. The date of the inscription is given in words as Satë trinsaty-adhike and then in numerical symbols as samvatsarāh 100 30 3. The last number 'three' is represented by three horizontal strokes one over the other, but between the symbols representing 30 and 3 another horizontal stroke, though shorter in size, is also noticeable. After the date in numerical symbols comes the term Srāvana-māsa. It is possible to interpret the year as 133 if the numerical symbols are taken into account. Then the expression Satë trimsaty-adhikë should be changed to Sate trayas-trimsatyadhikē. The omission of trayas before trimsat may be, as suggested by Dr. B. Ch. Chhabra, a case of haplography due to the carelessness of the engraver. Notwithstanding the investigations of a host of scholars, the latest of them being Prof. Mirashi, the starting point of the Ganga era is still a riddle awaiting a satisfactory solution. Dr. Fleet? who tried to arrange the Ganga genealogy and fix the starting point of the era by basing his arguments on the synchronism afforded by the Gödāvari grant of Prithivimüla, gave it up as the identification of Indrabhattāraka with Indrabhattāraka of the Chālukya dynasty did not stand scrutiny. On the other hand, Mr. G. Ramadas: basing on the astronomical details supplied by the grants themselves fixed 349 A. C. as the initial year of the Ganga Era ; but this was questioned by Mr. R. Subbarao' who, following the line of argument of Fleet, identified Indrabhattāraka of the Gödāvari grant of Prithivimüla with Indrabhattārakavarman of the Vishnukundin family and fixed the date of commencement of the Ganga era to be some time between 492 and 496 A.C. This was disputed by Mr. Somasekhara Sarma', as the chronology of the Vishnukundins itself has not been satisfactorily fixed, and as there was no agreement among scholars in the arrangement of the pedigrees furnished by the copper plate records of the rulers of the Vishnukundin family." After an exhaustive discussion with the help of astronomical details supplied by the grants Mr. Somasekhara Sarma surmised that the Pūrņimānta system of reckoning was followed during the rule of the early Gangas and that the "Epoch of the Ganga Era began in the Saka year 426-7 or 504-5 A.C. between June and January of that year". Prof. Mirashi of Nagpur, after detailed exainination of the Ganga dates showed that the "Ganga Era commenced on amänta Chaitra su, di, 1 in the Saka year 420 (the 14th March A.D. 498). In his note on the Ponnuturu plates of Ganga Bämantavarman he also suggested that though the Purnimänta scheme has been used in two of the earlier grants of the Ganga Era, the Amanta scheme has been adopted in later grants. If the surmise that the discrepancy in the numerical symbols employed in the present record is a scribal error and the suggested correction be accepted, then the grant was made in the year 133. It should be taken as the current year. The grant is said to have been made on the occasion of a solar eclipse on the new moon day of Srāvana. Calcluating from the starting point fixed by Prof. Mirashi, i.e., Saka 420 plus 132 expired years of the era, we get 8. 552 (630 A. C.) as the date of the grant. According to Swamikannu Pillai's Indian Ephemeris, on the 13th of August of that year there was a solar eclipse; but this was in the month of Bhadrapada. The village Tötavataka is said to have been situated in the Kröshtukavartani vishaya. Kroshtukavartani appears in many of the early Ganga plates as the name of a territorial division and has been identified with the area round about the Narasannapeta taluk in the Srikakulam 1 Ind. Ant., Vol. XVI, pp. 131 ff. * J BORS, Vol. IX, pp. 398 ff. : JAHRS, Vol. II, pp. 148 ff. . Ibid., Vol. V, p. 171 ff. and Ind. Cult., Vol. IX, No. 1, pp. 141 ff. . Above, Vol. XXVII, p. 192. 6 Ibid., Vol. XXVIII, pp. 171 fr.Page Navigation
1 ... 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490