Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 30
Author(s): Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

Previous | Next

Page 273
________________ 800 EPIGRAPHIA INDICA [VOL. XXX 40 Seers or about 82 pounds) of rice, possibly per day, to the deity with the cognizance of Mahādēva Pathin known from Nos. 1 and 3. The grant was made with clarified butter, curds, curry and betel-leaf as in the other cases analysed above. The other piece of land measured 10 Mānas (i.. 1 Vati) and was apparently situated in the same locality and dedicated to the same god. It is stated to have been granted for making provision for the supply of ten bundles (? hala) of fragrant flowers probably per day. This grant was made with the cognizance of a person called Kalud-mālani. The dates of the inscriptions under discussion raise certain interesting questions, the first of which relates to the initial year of the reign of Anangabhima III. The late Mr. M. Chakravarti believed that the said Ganga king ascended the throne in Saka 1133 (1211-12 A.D.) and this suggestion has been generally accepted by scholars. Our inscriptions, however, show that á date in his 13th regnal year (16th Anka) fell in Saka 1147 (1225-26 A.D.), while the end of the 24th 29th Anka) and the beginning of the 25th (31st Anka) year of his reign fell in the month of Kumbha or Phälguns in Saka 1158 (1236-37 A.D.). This fact would suggest that Anangabhima III ascended the throne not in Saka 1133 but in the month of Phälguna in Saka 1134. that is to may, about the beginning of 1213 A.D. Inscription No. 3 is dated in Saka 1158, Kumbha-sudi 6, corresponding to February 3, 1237 A.D. This date fell in the king's 29th Anka or 24th regnal year, while Inscription No. 4, is dated in Saka 1158, Phälguna (Kumbha)-badi 1 corresponding to February 12, 1237 A.D. and falling in his 31st Anka or 25th regnal year. Thus the end of the 24th and the beginning of the 25th regnal year of Ganga Anangabhima III fell on a date between the 3rd and 12th February, 1237 A.D. His accession or the beginning of his first regnal year therefore fell on a date in the corresponding period of 1213 A.D. It may be recalled in this connection that a Bhubaneswar inscription of Narasimha I, son and successor of Anangabhima III, is dated in Saka 1165 and in the Anka year 5 (i.e. the 4th regnal year) of that king's reign and that this suggests a later date than the one proposed by Chakravarti for this prince's accession. It has, however, to be admitted that, among other known records of the time of Anangabhima III, some would support the evidence of the inscriptions under study while some others would suggest & slightly earlier date for his accession. Similarly there is no uniformity in the epigraphic evidence relating to the date of the accession of Narasimha I. Much of this discrepancy is no doubt due to the mistakes committed by the scribes responsible for the epigraphs.? According to Chakravarti, the characteristics of the Anka system of regnal reckoning are the following: (1) 1 and all figures ending in 0 (except 10) and 6 should be omitted ; (2) the last Anka of one king and the second Aoka (i.e. regnal year 1) of the succeeding king fall in the same year ; and (3) the year begins on the day of Suniya, Simha (Bhadrapada) kukla-dvadasi. Inscriptions 1 JASB, 1903, p. 118. *JAHRS, Vol. VII, p. 233. Ind. Cult., Vol. III, p. 121. But this discrepanoy may possibly be rectified if the Saka year is regarded as current (see IHQ, Vol. XXXI, pp. 81 ff.). Seo 811, Vol. V, No. 1290-equating his 22nd Anka or 18th regnal year (Sinha-sudi 7, Friday) with Saka 1152 Ibid., No. 1282 dated Baka 1139 and the 9th Anks or 7th regnal year, and No. 1318 dated Saka 1147 and the 17th Anka or 14th regnal year (Mithuna-sudi 11, Wednesday). Cf. ibid., No. 1261 dated Baka 1176 (not 1179 w printed)=19th Anka or 16th regral year (Tula-sathkranti, hadi 1, Monday), and No. 1266 dated 1179 (not 1129 es printed) -24th Anks or 20th regnal year (Tula-sudi 3, Tuesday) which appear to suggest that Narasimha I Ascended the throne in the month of Tula in Saka 1161 (October, 1239 A.D.). But some inscriptions point to a date several months earlier. Cf. No. 1272 dated Saka 1163-4th Anka or 3rd regnal year (Rishabha-sudi 13, Thursday), No. 1308 dated Saka 1167=10th Ankl or 8th regnal year (Mins-sudi 6, Friday), eto. CE. , Vol. XXVIII, pp. 342 ff., for the responsibility of astrologers. JA8B, 1903, p. 100.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490