Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 27
Author(s): Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

Previous | Next

Page 88
________________ No. 11 ] GUNJI ROCK INSCRIPTION OF KUMARAVARADATTA 40 The inscription has been incised horizontally on a huge rock which, as stated before, lies beside the Damau Dahră pool near Gunji. It consists of four lines, of which the fourth is of about half the length of the rest. The writing covers a space 6' 6' broad and l' high. The size of the letters varies from 5 to 1.2". The inscription has suffered damage here and there from the effects of the weather, and on the proper right side, the surface of the rock has peeled off, causing the loss of about half a dozen aksharas in lines 3 and 4. Some more aksharas have become illegible in the middle of the first line and on the proper left side, but some of them can be supplied conjecturally, Very little of historical importance is therefore lost. The characters are of the Brāhmi alphabet resembling in a general way those of the Násik inscription of Ushavadata. The form of the initial a with the vertical ending in a curve tumed to the right, the initial i consisting of three horizontal strokes, kh without a loop at the base, v with a double triangle and I with the base line prolonged to the left are also noteworthy peculiarities. As regards medial vowels, the sign for ā is generally added at the top, see sahas-āyu-, 1.2, but in some cases at the middle, see Balādhikata, 1.2; thou sign is formed by continuing the right limb and in some cases by adding a curve to the vertical, see putena, 1.2 and Kumāra-, 1.1; the medial e is generally denoted by a horizontal stroke to the left, but in the it appears as a slanting stroke above the line. Many of the other letters show varying forms, marking a transition from the Asokan to the Kushāņa alphabet. G and t, for instance, have the angular top in some cases and the rounded one in others, see Godachhasa, 1.2 and Bhagavato, 1.1 ; natukeņa and Väsithiputena, both in 1.2; chha has the earlier form of a circle or an ellipse bisected by a vertical, sanitvachhare, 1.2; and the later double-looped one in the same word in 1.1; the dental d has throughout the transitional angular form open to the left, while the lingual d has &. round back in Godachhasa in 1.2 and an angular one in Dandanayakena, 11.2 and 3: dh faces right in sidhan] but is rectangular in Baladhikatena, 1.2, and circular in vadhinike, 1.2; the Asokan form of the letter & occurs in the akshara sa of sahas-äyu-, 1.2, but in other places it shows advanced forms, approximating in one c182 to that of the English letter N, seo aanvachhare and elasa. 1.3. The numerical symbols for 4, 5 and 10 oczur in the first line and those for 6, 10 and 1,000 in the third line. In the advanced forms of several letters, the present inscription resembles the Nāsik inscription of Ushavadāta, but since it exhibits .a considerable admixture of archaic forms not noticed in the latter, I put it slightly earlier. The inscription of Ushavadāta probably belongs to the second century A. D. as the year 42 mentioned in it is generally referred to the Saka era. The present inscription may therefore be referred to the first half of the first century A. D. The language is early Prakrit. As in other records of the age, double consonants are entirely absent except in gimha-, 1.3, and bamhanānain, 11.3 and 4. There is, again, no elision of intervocalic mutes as in literary Prakrits, see, e.g., natukena which, according to Hēmachandra (VIII, 1, 137), should be naltuent. For Usabha (Sanskrit, Rishabha) see Hömachandra, VIII. 1. 24.8 In matajuna (Sanskirt, mätrijana) we have an interchange of vowels as in vinohhuo (Sanskrit, vrixchika). Another noteworthy form is pathaviya (Sanskrit, prithivyām) in place of puhaviya or 1 Since its discovery in 1903, the inscription has lost an akshara at the end of the first line and an ornamental figure after it, similar to the one in the beginning of the same line. Those appear clearly in the photograph in the Gazetteer. They also show where the record ended originally. Above, Vol. VIII, p. 82. Compare Unabhadála in 1. 2 of the Násik cave inscription of Gantainiputra Satakarpi. (Above, Vol. VIIL, p. 71). *R. G. Bhandarkar, Wilson Philological Lectures (1914), p. 92. XVI-1.11

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490