Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 27
Author(s): Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

Previous | Next

Page 233
________________ 168 EPIGRAPHIA INDICA (VOL. XXVII the fort is not clear until its occupation by the Kalachuris. It seems to have remained in their possession up to the end of the eighth century A. D. Afterwards it was occupied successively by the Pratihāras, Rashtrakūtas, Chandēllas and Muhammadans, but the connection of the Kalachuris with the fort was remembered for a long time. The Kalachuryas of South India mention in their records with pride the title Kälañjara-pura-var-ādhisvara 'the lord of Kālajara, the best of cities.' 'This, like other similar titles, must be interpreted to mean that these princes were descended from a Kalachuri king wito formerly ruled at Kälañjara. The Kahlā plates of Sodhadova state that an illustrious Kalachuri prince established himself at Kālañjara from where he raided and conquered Ayõmukha (modern Partabgarh and Rai Bareli Districts of the U. P.). We are further told that having defeated his enemies, he gave the kingdom to his younger brother Lakshmanarāja. As I have shown elsewhere, this Lakhmanarāja was identical with the first prince of that name mentioned in the Kasia stone inscription. As the great-grandson of the latter, viz., Lakshmanarāja II alias Rajaputra, flourished about A. D. 775, Lakshmanarāja I can be placed in circa A. D. 700. The elder brother who placed him in charge of the territory round Kälañjara is unfortunately not named in the Kahlā plates, but in view of what has been said above, he may be identified with Vāmarāja. Vāmarāja may therefore be referred to the close of the seventh century A. D. Vāmarāja thus ruled over a large kingdom extending from the Gumti in the north to the Narmadā in the south and comprising the modern Bundelkhand and Baghelkhand, the Saugor and Jubbulpur Districts of the Central Provinces and the central portion of the United Provinces. He assumed the imperial titles Paramabhattāraka, Mahārājādhirāja and Paramēsvara. As the founder of the northern Kalachuri empire, he seems to have been held in great veneration by all his successors who ruled at Tripuri and so we find it stated in almost all subsequent official records that they meditated on his feet. As no records of his time have yet been discovered, we have no further knowledge of the political events of his reign. Since the time of Vămarāja, the Kalachuris came to be known as Chaidyas or lords of the Chodi country. As Pargiter has shown, Chēdi was orignally the name of the country along the southern bank of the Jumna from the Chambal on the northwest to the Karvi (which flows northeast of Chitrakūta) on the south-east. Its limits southwards were the plateau of Malwa and the hills of Bundelkhand. In later times Chēdi came to signify the modern province of Baghelkhand which remained in the possession of the Kalachuris till their downfall. Vämarāja seems to have transferred his capital from Māhishmati to Tripuri, modern Tewar, 6 mile: from Jubbulpur. This city dates back to very ancient times. It is mentioned in the Mahabharata and is also known from very rare copper coins with the legend Tipuri (Sanskrit, Tripuri) in Brähmi characters of the late third or early second century B. C.10 Varahamihira places the city in the south-eastern division 1 The Barah plate of Bhõjadēva shows that in the beginning of the ninth century A. D. the Kālañjara-mandala was ruled over by Sarvavarman who was a feudatory of NÄgabhata II. * In the tenth century A. D. the Pratihāras lost both Chitrakūta and Kalañjara which were occupied by the Rashtrakūtas probably during the northern campaign of Indra III. The two forts were in the occupation of the Rashtrakūtas in the time of Krishna III. Above, Vol. V, p. 194. According to the Khajuraho stone inscription (above, Vol. I, pp. 127-28) the fort of Kālañjara was occupied by the Chandellas during the reign of Yaśövarman (circa A. D. 930-950). 4 It was taken by Kutub-ud-din Aibak in April A. D. 1203, but was soon recovered by the Chandellas. See, e.g., J. B. B. R. A. S., Vol. IX, p. 330. . Above, Vol. VII, p. 89. Above, Vol. XXIII, p. 259. . Above, Vol. XVIII, pp. 128 ff. .J. A. S. B., Vol. LXIV, PP. 249 ff. 10 Allan, Catalogue of Coins in the British Museum, Ancient Coins, Introduction, p. cxl. 1 Brihatsamhita, adhyaya XIV, v. 9.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490