Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 43
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarkar
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 39
________________ FEBRUARY, 1914.] THE HISTORY OF THE NAIK KINGDOM OF MADURA 35 within their nominal rule were protected from foreign invasion and their propensity in fighting with one another kept in check." Subsequent researches have added much to the information given by Caldwell. It has been said that the first king of this line according to Caldwell was Parâkrama Paidya (1365) and the second Ponnumperumal Parâkrama Pâidya, who came to the throne in 1431,and that Mr. Sewell added the names of two kings between 1365 and 1431. Mr. Krishna Sastri confirms 1) the additions of Mr. Sewell. Only he says, on the authority of an earlier inscription, that Kule ekharail ruled in 1396 A.D. The Parakrama Pandya, whom Caldwell attributes to, year 1431 the really ascended the throne in 142212 A.D. and ruled for a space of 42 years till 1465 A. D. Arik sari Par3 krama 1422-65. From a large number of inscriptions concerning him at Kuttalam and Tenkasi, we find that Arikesari Parakrama is a celebrated figure in the history of the later Pâidyan kingdom. As the builder of the important and historic temple of Visvanathaswami at Tenkasi, “the Benares of the South," which, ever since his time, was the capital of the Paidyas, he will ever live in the history of Indian religion and art. The story goes that god Visvanatha of Benares appeared to him in a vision, and asked him, as his own temple in distant Benares was dilapidated, to build a new temple at Tenkasi, on the banks of the holy Chitra Nadhi, in the Tennar Nadu. The king accordingly commenced the building of a shrine in S. 1368. It was a huge undertaking, and occupied, from the laying of the foundation to the completion of the pinnacle, the long space of seventeen years, and did not cease with the king's death.23 Parâkrama Pâidya was a great devotee of Siva, and he signalised his piety by constructing, in addition to the Tenkasi temple, a sabha at Jayantipura, a mantapa to each of the gods at Marudhûr and Senbagavanam, and by bestowing liberal endowments on the Salitsvara temple at Tinnevelly. Arik sari Parakrama was not only a builder and devotee, but in the view of Mr. Gopinatha Rao, a great soldier and an important political figure of the age. An inscription affirms that he was the conqueror over the chiefs of Singai, Anurai, Irasai, Semba, Vindai, Mudali, Virai and Vaippar. Mr. Gôpirâtha Rao believes that he was also the enemy of the celebrated Narasa Naik, the father of Krishna Deva Râya. "In all the Vijayanagar grants of the second or Tuluva dynasty, Narasa Nayaka, the father of the distinguished Krishna Deva Raya, is said to have defeated a king of Madura named Mânabhâsha. We know that Narasa lived about the time of the first usurpation of the Vijayanagar kingdom by Sâluva Narasimha14 about 1470 A. D., and 8 Caldwell's Tinnevelly, p. 54. 9 See Madr. Ep. Rep. 1906, p. 72 which gives an account of the Puduk Mtah plates, which are an im. portant document in this period of Päädyan history : (Ep. Rep. 1908 09, p 85-86.) 10 Ep. Rep. 1908-9; p. 100, Mr. Krishna Sastri here sums up all the information in regard to the Påndyan dynasty of Tinnevelly. 11 Inscription No. 270 of 1908. 12 Madr. Ep. Rep. 1909-10, p. 100; Trav. Arch. p. 44. According to Keilhorn, Arikesari Ascended the throne between 10th Juno and 19th July 1422, as proved from astronomical calculations (Soo. Ep. Ind. VII) Keilhorn mentions a Vira Pandya Märavarman, whose inscriptions are found at Tenkasi, Kilayar Koil and Tiruvadi, and who came to the throne, according to his calculation, between March and July 1443, and ruled till at least 1457. (Ep. Ind. VII). 13 For some minor differences betweon Mr. Krishna Sastri and Mr. Gopinatha Rao in regd to the meaning of the phraseology of the inscription describing the building of the temple, see. Trav. a ch. Series, p. 52. 14 This is wrong. The Såluva usurpation took place only about 1486. Narasa, however, lived about 1470. But he could not have met Peråkrama, as the latter died in 1465.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344