Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 43
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarkar
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 118
________________ 114 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY [JUNE, 1914. palayams as they were called in the Tamil country, for notable exploits and services rendered by them to the State. The distinction for which they received their reward may have belonged to any department of life. Some were rewarded on account of their hardy physical strength and triumph over professional wrestlers, some on account of their skill in magic, others on account of their having distinguished themselves as local chieftains or efficient soldiers. Howsoever it was, whether the newcoming Polygar31 was a wrestler or a soldier, a chieftain or a statesman, he naturally never came alone. When he migrated to his new home, he took with him, as the MS. chronicles mention, hundreds of families of his own kinship and following, of his own caste and creed. The fertile valleys of the Kâvêri, the Vaigai, and the Tâmbraparni, the borders of the Western Ghats, the wild regions of Tinnevelly,—the whole of the South India from the Kaveri to the Cape became in this way spotted with a number of Telugu palayams. These palayams were based on military tenure. The Polygar was to clear the forests, to build villages, to extend cultivation, to execute irrigational works, to, in short, rule over his estate, which of course was inhabited by his own countrymen and to a larger extent by the Tamilians of the locality. The Pôlygar was thus in the position of a petty ruler. He had the hereditary right of succession vested in him, although the succession of a new Polygar to his paternal estate had to be ratified by the central authority. He could tax his people, and had at the same time to maintain the police, and arrange for and preside over the distribution of justice. He could, with special permission (which was granted only in extraordinary cases), even fortify the capital of his colony. The ordinarily permitted fortification was of mud; but special exploits achieved on behalf of the suzerain power procured from the Râya or his viceroy in Madura the sanction to build stone-forts as well. The Polygar lived in his palace; had hundreds of retainers, and held, during the Navaratri and other similarly important occasions, a Darbar or kolu as it is called in Tamil. To the central authority, he had of course to pay his tribute. He had further to maintain a stated number of troops, and wait on the Raya or the provincial viceroy whenever called on to do so. All official communication between the Naik Viceroy at Madura and the Polygar seems to have been carried on through sthanapatis or agents, whom each Polygår had the right to maintain in the capital. The date of the early Palayams of Trichinopoly and Manapparai. It is difficult to say, owing to the perplexing chronology and wild statements found in the chronicles of these adventurers, who, among these, came to South India in the 14th and 15th centuries, and who came later on with Visvanatha, the founder of the Naik dynasty at Madura. But there is no doubt that many of them were immigrants of the earlier period, though they did not arrire so early as some of the MSS. would make us believe. Taking the Trichinopoly district, for instance, which, as we shall see later on, formed part of the Naik dominion, we find that, out of the five palayam852 (Turaiyûr, Iluppí, Kulattûr Peramür and Ariyalûr) which belonged to it, three at least trace their founders to periods not 51 According to Wilks, the term Polygar is a comparatively modern term introduced by the Telugu government of Vijayanagar in the place of Udayar. See Wilks' Mysore, I, 21, footnote. 52 Turaiyur is even now the seat of & Zamindari, 12 miles N. of Magiri in the Trichinopoly District. Iluppúr also id Zamindari, 26 miles S. of Trichinopoly. Kulattar has become part of Pudukkottai. Peramar And Ariyalar are estates in Mu'iri and Udayarpalayam taluks. For the description of all these places seo Trichi. Gazr. and for a translation of their MS chronicles see appendix II on Trichinopoly palayams. A full reference to the bibliography of the history of these has also been given there.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344