Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 43
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarkar
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 207
________________ OCTOBER, 1914.] THE TRUE AND EXACT DAY OF BUDDHA'S DEATH. 203 (6) Bishop Bigandet remarks in a footnote on p. 133 of Vol. II that the Kauzda Era was abolished on a certain Saturday which was the new moon of Tabaong (March) and that the Eetzana Era commenced next day Sunday the first after the same new moon. This of course is not correct, since the old era was abolished with effect from Phalguna (Tabaong) sukla 1 (See Vol. I p. 13), while the new era was brought into force with effect from sukļa 1 of the next month Chaitra (=Tagu). On the other hand, while referring to the commencement of the New Religious Era (the era of Nirvana), Bigandet has made a mistake just the converse of the above. He says (foot note on the same p. 133 of Vol. II): "In the year 148, the first day of the month of Tagoo (April), which fell on a Sunday, was fixed as the beginning of the new computation, emphatically called the era of religion, 543 B. c." We need not concern ourselves with 543 B. c. (As a matter of fact, the first of the new moon of Chaitra or Tagoo in 543 B. C. was Wednesday, not Sunday.) But it will be seen from a comparison of this passage with those at p. 13 of Vol. I and p. 113 of Vol. II, (1) that where Bigandet affirms Phâlguna Su. 1 to have been the beginning of the Kauzda Era, he should have said this of Chaitra su. 1; and (2) that where he affirms Chaitra su. 1 to have been the beginning of the New Religious Era, he should have said this of Phalguna su. 1. So far, there may have been, on his part, a mere mistake of transposition of months, but in saying (in foot note to p. 133, Vol. II,) that Sunday was the beginning of the new religious era (Era of Buddha's death), he is backed by the calculations exhibited in my chart against the 8th date; and contradicted by his own statement in the text (p. 113 of Vol. II), that the New Religious Era began on a Monday. Should my conjecture that Sunday was the proper week-day in this case prove justified by a reference to the Burmese Manuscript used by Bigandet or to any other original text, then it will follow that "first of the waxing moon" throughout the chronicle translated by Bigandet means Sukla pratipada," and not the first heliacal rising of the moon. 7) In one or two instances, details of dates, not explicitly affirmed by Bigandet, have had to be supplied from other circumstances stated by him. Thus, as regards the birth of Buddha, we are told, in the first place (Vol. I, p. 28), that he entered the womb of his mother Mâyâ at a full moon under the Constellation Oottarathan" ("Uttara Ashadha"). Reference to the Eye-Tahle appended to my Indian Chronology" will show that this must have been the Full Moon of Sravana. As Buddha was born 9 months later under the constellation " Withaka (Visakha). (Vol. II, p. 71), the birth. as may be seen from the same table, must have taken place at the Vaisakha full moon. not 6 days after the same full moon, (as stated erroneously in the foot note to p 47 Vol. I), when Nakshatra "Vaisakha" would be an impossibility. ,, Similarly, when we are told (Vol. I. pp. 62-64) that Buddha, preparatory to embracing the life of an ascetic, left Kapilavastu "at the full moon of "July" under the constellation " Oottarathan," we may infer that it was the full moon of Ashadha month, because elsewhere Bigandet has rendered the Burmese "Watso" (-Ashadha month) by "July" (see, for instance, Vol. I, p. 200). July is no doubt the English equivalent of Ashadha at the present time; but it was not so in Buddha's time when the equivalent of Watso or Ashadha was May-June. The reader has to be reminded that English months, in 477 B. c. meant, in comparison with Indian months, a time of the sidereal year more than one month in advance of what they now mean. This result is due (1) to the forward movement of the Indian sidereal, as compared with the European tropical, year, and (2) to the dropping of 10 days in the Gregorian Calendar. In support of my statement that the departure from Kapilavastu took place on a Sunday. I may refer to Vol. II, p. 72 where the next day when he entered into solitude is given as Monday.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344